On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 18:34 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
Until now I'm fighting the uname-r-in-name and one-specfile
battles, I
really don't want to distract people from these issues until they are
done with.
debuginfos are intimately part of that "battle". It's not a
distraction, it's required information.
To answer your question on debuginfos: You simply change the name of
the debuginfo package
In the specfile? How? Examples? Surely you're not suggesting to just
rename the actual debuginfo rpm file on disk after it has been built and
be happy?
> As discussed previously in private mail, if you don't have
time to
> document something, just upload a few example packages built for let's
> say two successive FC kernels (complete with SRPMS, macro definitions,
> binaries and debuginfos) somewhere and post a link to that somewhere in
> public.
You mean like
http://ATrpms.net/?
I have no idea where to find the macro definitions and debuginfo
packages for your suggested scheme there.