On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> libXScrnSaver is packaged in Fedora already.

How do you think about to compare this approach with a specification from an other RPM-based software distribution?

How are the chances to use a package name like “libXss1” in more places?

> PS. Obviously, English isn't your primary language

This is true.

> and there's a communication barrier here,

Communication difficulties can often occur.

> because I don't understand what you're trying to say at all.

I am trying to check possibilities for name adjustments.

> Please try to be clearer, maybe by phrasing your questions
> in a different way.

Would you like to help in consistent packaging of a software like “Jitsi Desktop 2.10”?

The solution is to package your program officially **inside** of the distributions so for Fedora/EPEL see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
If an RPM package lives outside of the distributions it will be probably in a broken state very often, because things in a distribution base change all the time.

If you really want to build and maintain RPMS outside of the distributions then
the solution is to use conditionals like %if 0%{?fedora} your spec file:


> Real-time communications usually yield better results.

I imagine that corresponding results would be different if the dialogue could be performed also with audio (and video).

packaging mailing list -- packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org