> libXScrnSaver is packaged in Fedora already.
How do you think about to compare this approach with a specification from an other RPM-based software distribution?
package/view_file/openSUSE: Factory/libXScrnSaver/ libXScrnSaver.spec?expand=1
How are the chances to use a package name like “libXss1” in more places?
> PS. Obviously, English isn't your primary language
This is true.
> and there's a communication barrier here,
Communication difficulties can often occur.
> because I don't understand what you're trying to say at all.
I am trying to check possibilities for name adjustments.
> Please try to be clearer, maybe by phrasing your questions
> in a different way.
Would you like to help in consistent packaging of a software like “Jitsi Desktop 2.10”?
> Real-time communications usually yield better results.
I imagine that corresponding results would be different if the dialogue could be performed also with audio (and video).
packaging mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@lists.