On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:16 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
Alexey Torkhov wrote:
>>> Waiting for comments.
>> Since RHEL4 is based on FC3, would the dos2unix concerns be valid there
>> was well? Presumably EPEL packages are covered by the packaging
>> guidelines above...
>
> Supposedly, the bug that results in fail is
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=150277
>
> Updated the draft with the note that should be added to EPEL-specific
> guidelines.
This issue is fixed in EL-4 too:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=174016
Ah, good, so dropping EPEL4-specific note.
Alexey