On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 23:03 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
I don't see what changed since the discussion on JPackageNaming.
original arguments still stand, and no further element occurred to my
knowledge to justify changing the compromise that was painfully
These reasons need to be actually enumerated somewhere, so that they can
be re-examined with today's tools, and if today's tools aren't up to the
task we can have a target to shoot for with tomorrow's tools. Thus far
I have only seen hand wavy reasons as to why it's "needed" and no clear
statements as to what problems are being solved with their existence.
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?