On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:02 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/28/2009 12:49 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/27/2009 03:55 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>>> ca da eo es et gl hu id nb nl nn pt pt_BR sk sr sv tr zh_CN zh_TW
>>
>> Wouldn't it be best just to make 'filesystem' own the whole
directory
>> structure, and make the other packages just own the pages?
>
> I'm inclined to agree with this. Does anyone think this is a bad idea?
IIRC, we discussed this topic several years ago and already agreed up
it, then :)
IIRCĀ², the only problem left had been agreeing upon which "languages to
carry" and how let this "extended filesystem" interact with rpm
--excludedocs.
Will the list of languages to carry be explicitly defined, or will
it
just be the set of all languages that have one or man pages in the group
of @everything packages for that Fedora release?
[Problem: ATM, these lang-subdirs are installed by individual packages,
i.e. most users only see a subset of "all languages". With an "extended
filesystem" people would see all of them, with most of them being empty.
%ghosting them?]
Ralf
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging