On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
Michel Salim wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi>
> wrote:
>>
>> FYI, apart from some general common sense packaging guidelines, I
>> wouldn't
>> invest too much time into this at the moment. We're working on some
>> changes
>> to the bash completion dir structure and probably the mechanism with
>> which
>> individual completions are enabled upstream, it'll hopefully be included
>> in
>> not too distant future releases.
>>
> Ah, right. Thanks.
Provided what Ville said, if I were you, let your package own
/etc/bash_completion.d/ ;)
Indeed, that's what I did. Bugs filed against darcs
(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487012) and mercurial
(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487015) as well.
Regards,
--
miʃel salim •
http://hircus.jaiku.com/
IUCS • msalim(a)cs.indiana.edu
Fedora • salimma(a)fedoraproject.org
MacPorts • hircus(a)macports.org