On 03/17/2010 11:45 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:11 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
> lsb-cert (a metapackage which requires half the repository and
> lsb-scripts)
> lsb-scripts (just the functions and scripts)
>
> It's also a good opportunity to drop the unnecessary "redhat" in the
> naming scheme.
>
> Thoughts?
Would you then be making lsb-scripts require lsb-cert? Or would you
break that so that you can have lsb-scripts without the cert?
Yeah, the intent is so that lsb-scripts no longer requires the whole
pile of lsb-cert Requires.
~spot