Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm(a)ATrpms.net> wrote:
> So? That's not a problem with the mentioned patch.
Ignoring dependency_libs would break the following case:
- libA.la, static only...
1. That's why I mentioned on the libtool ml that the patch should only
apply in non-static lib cases (though I haven't the foggiest the
complications involved in implementing that).
2. Good thing we don't package static libs (or at least *strongly*