Il 12/07/2015 01:20, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ha scritto:
On Saturday, 11 July 2015 at 18:25, Germano Massullo wrote:
Reply from Pascal, one of the Darktable upstream developers http://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10582#note-5
Thanks. What I don't understand is why they're so opposed to the shared library idea. Why is camera support application-specific?
For all other readers: answer has been posted here just a few hours ago https://github.com/klauspost/rawspeed/issues/109#issuecomment-120668893
Dominik, your statement in github comment: <<a temporary (let's say 2 Fedora releases ~= 1 year) bundling exception could get a majority vote in favour. The issue would be revisited in 1 year and we would see where the three projects stand.>>
does it mean: - Fedora Packaging Committee will consider again the question next year and meanwhile the main mantainer and I have to stop releasing further Darktable updates; or - did you simply wanted to tell Darktable and Rawspeed developers that every year the Fedora Packaging Committee has to verify again if there are the conditions for an exception
?