On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:43:49 -0500, Michel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Michel Salim wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Ville Skyttä
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> FYI, apart from some general common sense packaging guidelines, I
>>> wouldn't
>>> invest too much time into this at the moment. We're working on some
>>> changes
>>> to the bash completion dir structure and probably the mechanism with
>>> which
>>> individual completions are enabled upstream, it'll hopefully be
included
>>> in
>>> not too distant future releases.
>>>
>> Ah, right. Thanks.
>
> Provided what Ville said, if I were you, let your package own
> /etc/bash_completion.d/ ;)
>
Indeed, that's what I did. Bugs filed against darcs
(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487012) and mercurial
(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487015) as well.
Which reminds me:
Does anyone have a script to examine repo metadata for all dependencies on
files/directories?
Do we have any package in the collection that depends on a directory
instead of a package name [to pull in a home directory e.g.]?