On 31/10/13 17:22, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 08:47:48AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> A prefix is necessary to make the scl packages unique from non-scl packages.
As a sysadmin, this seems obvious to me. Marcela, can you explain the
reasoning in _not_ doing it?
Packages are already unique. They have prefix e.g. ruby193. If we force
packagers add scl-ruby193 prefix, would it be more unique?
To not have two same names for collection should be solved by Change
proposal approved probably by FESCo.