----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy McMillan" <jeremy.mcmillan(a)gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora"
<packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 6:36:28 PM
Subject: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Naming of Python 3 binaries
Yes, please make the unversioned binary the default version required by
system utilities. Python 2 should be relegated to special case use where
library dependencies cannot be made to work under Python 3. This should
probably be made explicit in release notes and documentation.
On Nov 25, 2015 6:16 AM, "Juan Orti Alcaine" < j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com
>
wrote:
There is already a fpc ticket to address python binaries confusion,
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/558
Hi,
I'm reading the guidelines about the naming of conflicting
python2/python3 binaries [1], and I have doubts about if it is up to
date.
It says: "The unversioned executable must be the python2 version.", is
this still true? In the example shown some lines before, the
unversioned binary goes to the python3 package.
With python3 as the default I guess the unversioned binary should be
the python3 one.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Naming
--
Juan Orti
https://apuntesderootblog.wordpress.com/
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Robert Kuska
{rkuska}