* Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> [2008-03-27 15:37]:
Deepak Bhole wrote:
> An important reason we need the jpp in there currently is to maintain
> compatibility with JPackage.
> With the way the naming is right now, users can enable a JPackage
> repository beside a Fedora repo, and are guaranteed to get the latest
> either from Fedora or JPackage,...
> e.g package foo is currently at 1.0-1jpp in jpackage and 1.0-1jpp.1 in
Stripping 'jpp' works fine (at least according to my quick-n-dirty use of
1.0-1jpp < 1.0-2 < 1.0-2jpp
Until Fedora does a 1.0-3 to fix something, with the -3 still being
split from the 1jpp, never having acquired the fixes from 1jpp->2jpp
Fedora-packaging mailing list