tibbs(a)math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) writes:
ES> We came to the agreement that things like
>> Requires: php >= 4.2
ES> do not make sense.
We did?
I think so:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-July/msg00086.html
http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/spectemplate-pear.spec
>> Requires: php >= current PHP version
ES> a MUST item?
Because you haven't gone in and changed the draft.
ok; updated.
Look, folks, I'm just a monkey here. I'm trying to parrot
all of the
discussion into a file because nobody else seems to be bothering to do
so; if I miss something then I miss something. Don't read anything
else into it.
ok; but I do not understand the drafts-flow then. IMO, drafts should
reflect the state of current discussion and should be updated. It does
not help when discussion on maillist is ignored and some obsolete
document will be ratified.
Enrico