On 11/12/2010 12:47 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
I'm currently reviewing pgRouting:
the packager is currently using "postgresql-pgrouting" as the name, which
is alright but a bit long. There does not seem to be a policy for naming
DB add-ons yet (though I see a couple of postgresql-* packages).
Would the same policy applied as to, say, the Python add-ons? e.g.
"if the name starts with [pP]y then you don't need the python- prefix".
In this case, "pg" would clearly indicate that it's to be used with
I think a case could be made for an exception, yes (though our
guidelines don't explicitly mention the postgresql/pg case yet).