Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 02:28 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Steven Pritchard wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:45:01PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>> I'd like to package up Maia Mailguard, and the license appears to be
>>> original BSD (advertising clause included) with a branding extension
>>> added. Thoughts?
>> Isn't Maia a fork of amavisd-new?
> Pretty much, yeah.
>> If so, how can its license be anything other than than GPL?
I don't think amavisd-new had any web interface.
That part of the license may apply only to the web interface.
That is indeed the case.
> Good question... I'll raise that with the authors.
Yes, and it would be nice if the author would release it under pure GPL,
or maybe the Affero GPL ?
That would be a "not likely". :)
Seems this won't fly as an official Fedora package. No biggie, the Maia
folks have offered to host it or link to it or whatever, wherever it