On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:37:21AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> A prefix is necessary to make the scl packages unique from non-scl packages.
> I did mention that the downstream naming was wrong and would need to be
> changed a long time ago.
I could find places where you mentioned that it was wrong, but I didn't find any
reasoning. Could you please state why you think the downstream naming is wrong?
Just replied to mmaslano -- I believe I've only mentioned it onlist because
I discussed it with mmaslano on IRC and with langdon in #scl on freenode
when doing the initial review of the draft. Apologies for that, I assumed
from mmaslano's comments that there was an scl team that was actively
discussing a prefix (using a vendor) and that she would carry back the
rationale as to why no prefix wouldn't work.