On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 16:56 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:44:31PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:58:03PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I suggest to vote through email [...]
>
> 5 voted, 5 still to go. Can the remaining committee members do their
> voting business, please? Maybe we get this rejected and all can be
> happy again ;)
>
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AxelThimm/kmdls/voting
>
> I added Ville's votes (and copied them verbatim for Toshio on his
> wish) but the first because he made it indirectly dependent on the
> outcome: Ville & Toshio you need to decide on the first item, if you
> are not sure better reject than accept, but don't conditionalize, it
> makes vote counting difficult. :)
>
> Note: Don't use "0", it's the same as "-1" in
fedora-packaging.
As a committee we need to decide on certain items either positive or
negative. Allowing discussion before voting is OK, but having a
stalled voting over weeks isn't really an advertisment for our work.
Please vote within the next day until Wed 16:00UTC. I'll consider the
missing votes as "-1", but mark them as "0" to distinguish from the
actual votes.
I vote -1 on all items, not because KMDL has anything incorrect, but
because I do not wish to overhaul an existing standard, rather than
correct the flaws present in it.
~spot
--
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader:
http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!