On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 17:50 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote :
> Joe Orton wrote:
> > Standardising an inadequate workaround and
> > having packagers go through fixing N hundred spec files to match seems
> > like a waste of time.
> *sigh*. One justification the FPC had used for mandating a standard
> buildroot was to avoid the waste of time associated with endless debates on
> mailing lists and package reviews. So much for that plan. (:
The "standard" buildroot plan is a good plan, as long as the goal
involves ripping it out from all spec files once and for all (i.e. have
a sane default set for rpmbuild).
I keep repeating this, sorry, but am I the only one who'd like to see
all useless and repetitive stuff taken out of spec files?
- The "-q" to %setup
- BuildRoot cleanup when %install and %clean start
- %defattr(-,root,root,-) or %defattr(-,root,root,0755)
No. Accepting patches. Welcoming patches.