On 08/23/2010 05:51 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote:
> Le lundi 23 août 2010 à 17:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
>> On 08/23/2010 03:30 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>>> On 08/20/2010 08:35 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote:
>>>> hello,
>>>> i have do a ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/7 since 3 week
>>>> and i wait always!
>>>
>>> Jonathan,
>>>
>>> We're working on your ticket. :)
>>>
>>> One question that I have for you is this:
>>>
>>> In your template, you do not use %{d_libdir}. Why not? It seems to
>>> conflict with the rest of your draft.
>>
>> Slightly related to this question:
>>
>> Why do you need %{d_libdir} rsp. why isn't %{libdir} sufficent?
>>
>> Ralf
>>
>> --
>> packaging mailing list
>> packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
>
> because for feet with other distribution like debian ubuntu ... i put
> header file in /usr/include/d
d_includedir makes sense (header), but libraries?
d_libdir only makes sense if the libraries being produced by "D" are
incompatible to GNU/Linux system library file format conventions.
Or conversely: The language a library in %libdir is being implemented
in, should be irrelevant.
Ralf
oh sorry i read too quicly last time.
I use _d_libdir for file /etc/ldc.conf who need D lib path