Dne 28.2.2012 17:32, Jon Ciesla napsal(a):
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Rex
> On 02/28/2012 10:13 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 28.2.2012 16:59, Rex Dieter napsal(a):
>>> On 02/28/2012 09:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>> Pleas do not be mistaken. We are not speaking about building gems from
>>> OK, so... is there some other better way to do it then? Please do
>>> suggest any better alternative if you do.
>> Better way is not doing it.
> I guess we may have to agree to disagree then. Guidelines that allow for
> not building from (preferred form) source is deal-breaker for me at least.
Agreed. We have to rebuild Java jars, or not include them, no matter
how uncomfortable COUGH*gallery2*COUGH. I don't see why another
language should be any different.
It is different, because we do not provide any .gem package at the end.
.gems and .jars are something completely different. May be it is good
time to take a look on some rubygem's spec file.
> -- rex
> packaging mailing list