On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 19:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Braden McDaniel <braden(a)endoframe.com> writes:
> Since apparently a requirement for "foo" can be satisfied by any
> available architecture for which a "foo" is available,
> do not specify the architecture are unsafe for multilib systems (unless
> the dependency really can be satisfied by any architecture--which does
> not strike me as the most common case).
Surely this is a bug, not something that every single specfile must
If it's a bug, then how do you propose a specfile should articulate a
"Requires" that *can* be satisfied by any architecture?
Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you think the bug is...?
Braden McDaniel <braden(a)endoframe.com>