Hi all,
    Sorry for such late response, my laptop just died :'(( and since I'm in a conference, I have limited computer access.

As for the name, yes, it was one of my primary concerns.  I figured that would have been resolved at the end.  I thought about perhaps naming it root-analyzer.

At Jefferson Lab, where I'm at, we have our own version just called Analyzer.  And it's very common to just think of it as root-analyzer.  So that might work as a name.  If need be, I guess I'll have to dwell into the code and change the names of the binaries and various daemons.

I submitted the spec and source file in for review.  Thank you all for your early pre-reviews.

--Juan Carlos

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu> wrote:
>>>>> "SV" == Seth Vidal <skvidal@fedoraproject.org> writes:

SV> You'd think that, alas, this is not to be so. :(

Well, we can at least choose a reasonable name for the Fedora package;
renaming the daemons and executables is probably a bit much to ask,
unless they conflict with those from other packages.

SV> I had to deal with root for years. It likes to run a daemon named
SV> 'rootd'. There's nothing that makes a sysadmin cringe up like a
SV> process named 'rootd'

I can only imagine what happens when a user says "I need root on my
machine".

 - J<

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging