On Friday 02 January 2009, you wrote:
Le jeudi 01 janvier 2009 à 21:09 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> but for me
> the "fontpackages" package name sounds pretty weird. I think similar
> packages are usually called foo-common; was "fonts-common" ever
I rather like the way it expands in nice self-explanatory
fontpackages-filesystem and fontpackages-devel binary packages.
Oops, sorry, I hadn't noticed that there's no main package. -filesystem
and -devel don't sound bad/odd at all - the scenario I would have found quite
weird would have been if one would for some reason explicitly install a
package called fontpackages and get no font packages installed.