Quoting Tom Lane (2012-09-11 19:27:08)
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com> writes:
> What some people don't like is that F16/17 git history will contain
> mention of F18 mass rebuild, but that is (again IMO) a very minor
> "issue".
FWIW, I beg to differ. There is no problem at all if you skip over
release number 3 in some branch, but having a specfile changelog that
lies about what happened in that branch is a bad idea. It'll lead to
confusion later.
If the commit was anything else than raising release tag and adding a
changelog entry I'd completely agree. As originally stated, I am aware
of opinions like yours and even if I don't agree...it's up to maintainer
to decide in the end (unless one of us brings the issue in front of
FPC/FESCO :-) ).
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com