Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com> writes:
What some people don't like is that F16/17 git history will
contain
mention of F18 mass rebuild, but that is (again IMO) a very minor
"issue".
FWIW, I beg to differ. There is no problem at all if you skip over
release number 3 in some branch, but having a specfile changelog that
lies about what happened in that branch is a bad idea. It'll lead to
confusion later.
regards, tom lane