Le Jeu 12 avril 2007 09:06, seth vidal a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 09:55 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > Orion Poplawski (orion(a)cora.nwra.com) said:
> >> Here's a question. Should -devel package requirements be of the
> form:
> >>
> >> Requires: package-devel.%{arch}
> >
> > Doesn't work, so... no.
>
> Doesn't work, but interesting timing :)
>
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/rpm-devel/2007-April/002260.html
>
I'd like to offer a HELL NO in reference to that syntax.
Please someone explain JBJ that spec syntax must be parseable by humans,
and Arch(foo) will only make packagers try Version(foo).
Sanity demands foo(arch=x and version >y) if he wants packagers to
tokenize EVR for him
--
Nicolas Mailhot