On Wednesday, 08 October 2014 at 17:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:52:45PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:48:30 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Could just using Provides: python3-aiohttp suffice?
Building two binaries for the same python stack seems a little bit of a waste of resources.
Why two?
python-aiohttp src.rpm does not need to build a package for %name. It can build "subpackages" with other names.
Ah ok. I had mis-understanding your idea, should work and reflect reality nicely
Exactly. If you have an empty %files section for the main package (or none at all) and populate just %files -n python3-aiohttp, you'll end up with one binary package with a correct name.
Regards,