Despite the removal of i686 from Fedora repositories https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8529, I have a build https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f9333353d9 that includes i686.
Is it due to "ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64" being present in the spec? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ga/blob/d757bfd5d6e0d79cf64c6528a5bab8156...
Is the presence of i686 also making the build to stay 3 days in "Pending -> Stable"?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:16 PM Marcin Dulak marcin.dulak@gmail.com wrote:
Despite the removal of i686 from Fedora repositories https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8529, I have a build https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f9333353d9 that includes i686.
Is it due to "ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64" being present in the spec? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ga/blob/d757bfd5d6e0d79cf64c6528a5bab8156...
Is the presence of i686 also making the build to stay 3 days in "Pending -> Stable"?
Hi!
In fact, ExclusiveArch has nothing to do with either of those things.
1. Only composes are no longer done for i686, but packages for i686 are still being built - particularly for multilib support on x86_64. So it's completely normal for packages to also get built on i686.
2. This is caused by the fact that the beta freeze for fedora 32 is still in effect, at least until Tue 2020-03-17. After the beta freeze is lifted, your update will get pushed to stable like usual.
Fabio
packaging mailing list -- packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject....
OK.
Is building i686 a requirement still for fedora >= 32? I have a software that fails to function on i686 https://github.com/edoapra/fedpkg/pull/9, I guess it's fine to use "ExclusiveArch: x86_64"
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org