problem with mock, builds only static library

[Bruno Postle]

I'm looking at packaging TinySVM for fedora and I have a src.rpm 
that builds fine with rpmbuild:

http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/9/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/Ti...

..except that when I build in mock, all I get is a static library 
and no dynamic libraries.  The error message is:

*** Warning: This library needs some functionality provided by -lm.
*** I have the capability to make that library automatically link in when
*** you link to this library.  But I can only do this if you have a
*** shared version of the library, which you do not appear to have.
*** The inter-library dependencies that have been dropped here will be
*** automatically added whenever a program is linked with this library
*** or is declared to -dlopen it.
*** Since this library must not contain undefined symbols,
*** because either the platform does not support them or
*** it was explicitly requested with -no-undefined,
*** libtool will only create a static version of it.

This doesn't make sense, the root seems to have everything needed.  
What am I missing?

[Bruno Postle]

On Sat 16-Aug-2008 at 23:30 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> I'm looking at packaging TinySVM for fedora and I have a src.rpm that 
> builds fine with rpmbuild:
>
> http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/9/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/Ti...

I still have this problem, I forgot to link to the .spec file 
before:

http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/SPECS/TinySVM.spec
> ..except that when I build in mock, all I get is a static library and no 
> dynamic libraries.  The error message is:
>
> *** Warning: This library needs some functionality provided by -lm.
> *** I have the capability to make that library automatically link in when
> *** you link to this library.  But I can only do this if you have a
> *** shared version of the library, which you do not appear to have.
> *** The inter-library dependencies that have been dropped here will be
> *** automatically added whenever a program is linked with this library
> *** or is declared to -dlopen it.
> *** Since this library must not contain undefined symbols,
> *** because either the platform does not support them or
> *** it was explicitly requested with -no-undefined,
> *** libtool will only create a static version of it.
>
> This doesn't make sense, the root seems to have everything needed.  What 
> am I missing?

[Denis Leroy]

Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Sat 16-Aug-2008 at 23:30 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> > I'm looking at packaging TinySVM for fedora and I have a src.rpm that 
> > builds fine with rpmbuild:
> >
> > http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/9/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/Ti...
>
> I still have this problem, I forgot to link to the .spec file before:
>
> http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/SPECS/TinySVM.spec

The "-rpath /usr/lib64" on the libtool link line is the problem. Also, 
it's compiling with '-O9 -funroll-all-loops', which is scary.