problem with mock, builds only static library

[Bruno Postle]

I'm looking at packaging TinySVM for fedora and I have a src.rpm 
that builds fine with rpmbuild:

http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/9/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama...

..except that when I build in mock, all I get is a static library 
and no dynamic libraries.  The error message is:

*** Warning: This library needs some functionality provided by -lm.
*** I have the capability to make that library automatically link in when
*** you link to this library.  But I can only do this if you have a
*** shared version of the library, which you do not appear to have.
*** The inter-library dependencies that have been dropped here will be
*** automatically added whenever a program is linked with this library
*** or is declared to -dlopen it.
*** Since this library must not contain undefined symbols,
*** because either the platform does not support them or
*** it was explicitly requested with -no-undefined,
*** libtool will only create a static version of it.

This doesn't make sense, the root seems to have everything needed.  
What am I missing?

-- 
Bruno

[Bruno Postle]

On Sat 16-Aug-2008 at 23:30 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
>  I'm looking at packaging TinySVM for fedora and I have a src.rpm
> that 
>  builds fine with rpmbuild:
>
>
> http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/9/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama...
I still have this problem, I forgot to link to the .spec file 
before:

http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/SPECS/TinySVM.spec

>  ..except that when I build in mock, all I get is a static library and
> no 
>  dynamic libraries.  The error message is:
>
>  *** Warning: This library needs some functionality provided by -lm.
>  *** I have the capability to make that library automatically link in when
>  *** you link to this library.  But I can only do this if you have a
>  *** shared version of the library, which you do not appear to have.
>  *** The inter-library dependencies that have been dropped here will be
>  *** automatically added whenever a program is linked with this library
>  *** or is declared to -dlopen it.
>  *** Since this library must not contain undefined symbols,
>  *** because either the platform does not support them or
>  *** it was explicitly requested with -no-undefined,
>  *** libtool will only create a static version of it.
>
>  This doesn't make sense, the root seems to have everything needed.  What 
>  am I missing?

[Denis Leroy]

Bruno Postle wrote:
>  On Sat 16-Aug-2008 at 23:30 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> > I'm looking at packaging TinySVM for fedora and I have a src.rpm that 
> > builds fine with rpmbuild:
> >
> >
> http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/9/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama...
>
> >
>  
>  I still have this problem, I forgot to link to the .spec file before:
>  
>  http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/SPECS/TinySVM.spec 

The "-rpath /usr/lib64" on the libtool link line is the problem. Also, 
it's compiling with '-O9 -funroll-all-loops', which is scary.