On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 00:45 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Is it a packaging error if a src.rpm can only be expected to
reliably
build inside mock/mach?
IMO, yes, definitely - Package building/re-building must
be
deterministically reproduce the same results in both chroot'ed and
non-chroot'ed environments.
If it is a packaging error, what would be the best course of action?
IMO, if a package can't be rebuilt in a user environment it qualifies as
broken and "not ready for release".
Some solutions include manually installing what you DO want to
package
That would be a packager's hack/resort to work around a broken package.
(what I have been doing), perhaps a bunch of configure switches
telling
configure not to build all of the plugins you don't intend to package,
or telling rpm to ignore unpackaged files.
Yes, this would be an approach upstream
could choose to fix such issues.
Ralf