Fwd: tex dependencies on EPEL

[Gianluca Sforna]

Hi all,
I am packaging a largish rpm here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125

and I've got to build its documentation from sources using tex. In
Fedora land, I managed to find a simple way to specify which packages
I need as Buildrequries, like this:

BuildRequires: tex(titlesec.sty)
BuildRequires: tex(framed.sty)
BuildRequires: tex(threeparttable.sty)
BuildRequires: tex(wrapfig.sty)
BuildRequires: tex(upquote.sty)
BuildRequires: tex(multirow.sty)

But this apparently does not work in EPEL 6 (no deps found) or EPEL 7
(tex(upquote.sty) not found).

So, any suggestion about how to proceed here?



--
Gianluca Sforna

http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu

[Dan Horák]

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:33:59 +0100
Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi all,
>  I am packaging a largish rpm here:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
>  
>  and I've got to build its documentation from sources using tex. In
>  Fedora land, I managed to find a simple way to specify which packages
>  I need as Buildrequries, like this:
>  
>  BuildRequires: tex(titlesec.sty)
>  BuildRequires: tex(framed.sty)
>  BuildRequires: tex(threeparttable.sty)
>  BuildRequires: tex(wrapfig.sty)
>  BuildRequires: tex(upquote.sty)
>  BuildRequires: tex(multirow.sty)
>  
>  But this apparently does not work in EPEL 6 (no deps found) or EPEL 7
>  (tex(upquote.sty) not found).
>  
>  So, any suggestion about how to proceed here? 
Than (in CC) recently introduced a package "texlive-extensions" in
EPEL-7 that should be used to distribute TeXlive content that's
unlikely to be included in the RHEL version of TeXlive. So I suggest to
submit a bug asking for inclusion of the missing styles.


		Dan

[than]

Am 18.11.2015 um 12:47 schrieb Dan Horák:
>  On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:33:59 +0100
>  Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I am packaging a largish rpm here:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
> >
> > and I've got to build its documentation from sources using tex. In
> > Fedora land, I managed to find a simple way to specify which packages
> > I need as Buildrequries, like this:
> >
> > BuildRequires: tex(titlesec.sty)
> > BuildRequires: tex(framed.sty)
> > BuildRequires: tex(threeparttable.sty)
> > BuildRequires: tex(wrapfig.sty)
> > BuildRequires: tex(upquote.sty)
> > BuildRequires: tex(multirow.sty)
> >
> > But this apparently does not work in EPEL 6 (no deps found) or EPEL 7
> > (tex(upquote.sty) not found).
> >
> > So, any suggestion about how to proceed here?
>  Than (in CC) recently introduced a package "texlive-extensions" in
>  EPEL-7 that should be used to distribute TeXlive content that's
>  unlikely to be included in the RHEL version of TeXlive. So I suggest to
>  submit a bug asking for inclusion of the missing styles.
>
>
>  		Dan 
yes, please fill a bug (component: texlive-extensions)for adding the 
missing styles in in epel7
For EPEL 6, you need to add BR on texlive.

Than

[Gianluca Sforna]

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:33 PM, than <than(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  yes, please fill a bug (component: texlive-extensions)for adding the missing
>  styles in in epel7 
Done, thanks!

>  For EPEL 6, you need to add BR on texlive. 
Ok, thanks a lot for your help.

-- 
Gianluca Sforna

http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu

[than]

Am 19.11.2015 um 12:04 schrieb Gianluca Sforna:
>  On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:33 PM, than <than(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>
> > yes, please fill a bug (component: texlive-extensions)for adding the missing
> > styles in in epel7
>  Done, thanks!
>  
i still haven't got any message from bugzilla about this issue yet, 
could you please give me the bugzilla number, so i can
take a look?

Thanks

Than

[Gianluca Sforna]

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:23 AM, than <than(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  i still haven't got any message from bugzilla about this issue yet, could
>  you please give me the bugzilla number, so i can
>  take a look? 
Weird. Here is the link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283583




-- 
Gianluca Sforna

http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu