Re: [Fedora-packaging] [perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 10/22/2012 03:47 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
>  commit e00f8293097f8331883f1df35f74be70fbb290b9
>  Author: Petr Písař <ppisar(a)redhat.com&gt;
>  Date:   Mon Oct 22 15:46:27 2012 +0200
>
>       Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
>
>    perl-Coro.spec |    2 +-
>    1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  ---
>  diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec
>  index 50a855d..31589a5 100644
>  --- a/perl-Coro.spec
>  +++ b/perl-Coro.spec
>  @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Requires:       perl(EV) >= 3
>    Requires:       perl(Event) >= 1.08
>    Requires:       perl(Guard) >= 0.5
>    Requires:       perl(Storable) >= 2.15
>  -Provides:       bundled(libecb) = %(rpm -q libecb --qf '%{VERSION}')
>  +Provides:       bundled(libecb)%(rpm -q libecb --qf ' = %{VERSION}'
> 2>/dev/null) 
I could be wrong, but IIRC, calling rpm inside of rpm specs is not 
allowed in Fedora.

Apart of this, what you are doing is rendering your built 
non-deterministic - Another "strictly forbidden" item.

Ralf

[perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host

[Rex Dieter]

On 10/22/2012 10:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>  On 10/22/2012 03:47 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > commit e00f8293097f8331883f1df35f74be70fbb290b9
> > Author: Petr Písař <ppisar(a)redhat.com&gt;
> > Date:   Mon Oct 22 15:46:27 2012 +0200
> >
> >      Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
> >
> >   perl-Coro.spec |    2 +-
> >   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec
> > index 50a855d..31589a5 100644
> > --- a/perl-Coro.spec
> > +++ b/perl-Coro.spec
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Requires:       perl(EV) >= 3
> >   Requires:       perl(Event) >= 1.08
> >   Requires:       perl(Guard) >= 0.5
> >   Requires:       perl(Storable) >= 2.15
> > -Provides:       bundled(libecb) = %(rpm -q libecb --qf '%{VERSION}')
> > +Provides:       bundled(libecb)%(rpm -q libecb --qf ' = %{VERSION}'
> > 2>/dev/null)
>
>  I could be wrong, but IIRC, calling rpm inside of rpm specs is not
>  allowed in Fedora.
>
>  Apart of this, what you are doing is rendering your built
>  non-deterministic - Another "strictly forbidden" item. 
Agreed.  What you're trying to say essentially is that the bundled 
libecb version matches the system/non-bundled version, which really 
doesn't make any sense.  I'd suggest you simply remove the versioning 
(or list the real bundled version some other way).

-- rex

[perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:14:25AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>  On 10/22/2012 10:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>  >On 10/22/2012 03:47 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
>  >>commit e00f8293097f8331883f1df35f74be70fbb290b9
>  >>Author: Petr Písař <ppisar(a)redhat.com&gt;
>  >>Date:   Mon Oct 22 15:46:27 2012 +0200
>  >>
>  >>     Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
>  >>
>  >>  perl-Coro.spec |    2 +-
>  >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  >>---
>  >>diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec
>  >>index 50a855d..31589a5 100644
>  >>--- a/perl-Coro.spec
>  >>+++ b/perl-Coro.spec
>  >>@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Requires:       perl(EV) >= 3
>  >>  Requires:       perl(Event) >= 1.08
>  >>  Requires:       perl(Guard) >= 0.5
>  >>  Requires:       perl(Storable) >= 2.15
>  >>-Provides:       bundled(libecb) = %(rpm -q libecb --qf '%{VERSION}')
>  >>+Provides:       bundled(libecb)%(rpm -q libecb --qf ' = %{VERSION}'
>  >>2>/dev/null)
>  >
>  >I could be wrong, but IIRC, calling rpm inside of rpm specs is not
>  >allowed in Fedora.
>  >
>  >Apart of this, what you are doing is rendering your built
>  >non-deterministic - Another "strictly forbidden" item.
>  
>  Agreed.  What you're trying to say essentially is that the bundled
>  libecb version matches the system/non-bundled version, which really
>  doesn't make any sense.  I'd suggest you simply remove the versioning
>  (or list the real bundled version some other way).
>   
Also -- did you get a bundling exception for this?  I don't see it listed on
the No Bundled Library page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_gr...

-Toshio