Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFE: Documentation packages - no base packagedependency

[Mamoru TASAKA]

>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation
>  
>  Proposed addition to the guidelines:
>  
>      Independent documentation -doc packages typically don't require the
>      base package. It should be possible to install documentation without
>      having to install a program and all its dependencies.
>  
>  Rationale: Recently, in package review requests, I've seen packagers apply
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
>  also to -doc packages. And there are packages in the collection, which
>  do that, too. This is a hindrance, especially if one only wants to peruse
>  the documentation or install API documentation for remote developing.
>  Of course, an exception to this is documentation in a special format,
>  which can only be viewed within an application.
>  
>  Thoughts? 
Perhaps meaning of "Independent" (documentation) is ambiguous.

Additionally, I think that many -doc subpackage requires main package is because
-doc installs documents under the directory the main package owns:
i.e. the main package has some "important" documents in one directory
and the rest documents are included in -doc subpackage, and -doc uses the
same directory. Usually I don't want to duplicate ownership of the same directory 
for this reason (so usually make -doc subpackage require main package),
however I don't object to your thought so much. I think it is better to write
explicitly
that duplicating directory ownership is allowed (if your new proposition is
accepted).

Regards,
Mamoru