FE-Legal review

[Bernard Johnson]

I've blocked a submitted package (ntop) on FE-Legal.  I'm not sure who
to prod regarding "Apache License, Version 2.0, incompatible with GPL"
starting at comment 46.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025#c46

If this is going to be a problem, it looks like I can remove the Apache
2 files (patch them out).  I'm assuming that is sufficient and a
modified tarball won't be needed.

Since someone will ask: No, this is not documentation, it is javascript
used by the built-in web server.

Can someone who does the FE-Legal reviews take a look at this for me?

Thanks.

[Tom Callaway]

On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 02:25 -0700, Bernard Johnson wrote:
>  I've blocked a submitted package (ntop) on FE-Legal.  I'm not
> sure who
>  to prod regarding "Apache License, Version 2.0, incompatible with GPL"
>  starting at comment 46.
>  
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025#c46
>  
>  If this is going to be a problem, it looks like I can remove the Apache
>  2 files (patch them out).  I'm assuming that is sufficient and a
>  modified tarball won't be needed.
>  
>  Since someone will ask: No, this is not documentation, it is javascript
>  used by the built-in web server.
>  
>  Can someone who does the FE-Legal reviews take a look at this for me? 
Yes, but I just got back to the US, and I'm really mentally and
physically exhausted. I'll look at this sometime this week.

~spot