fontname-fonts or fonts-fontname?

[Dawid Gajownik]

Hi!

Houston, we've got a problem ;)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179439#c7

Do we have any naming guidelines concerning packages with fonts? There 
is some inconsistency:

[y4kk0@X ~]$ repoquery -qa | grep fonts
bitmap-fonts-0:0.3-4.noarch
fonts-gujarati-0:1.10-2.noarch
fonts-tamil-0:1.10-2.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-14-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-bengali-0:1.10-2.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-15-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
kon2-fonts-0:0.3.9b-26.i386
fonts-japanese-0:0.20050222-3.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-9-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-syriac-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
gentium-fonts-0:1.02-2.noarch
hunky-fonts-0:0.3.1-2.fc4.noarch
taipeifonts-0:1.2-26.noarch
ghostscript-fonts-0:5.50-13.noarch
fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi-0:1.0-7.noarch
fonts-ISO8859-2-0:1.0-14.noarch
fonts-arabic-0:1.5-3.noarch
mgopen-fonts-0:0.20050515-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-9-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
tetex-fonts-0:3.0-9.FC4.i386
fonts-xorg-cyrillic-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-punjabi-0:1.10-2.noarch
fonts-hebrew-0:0.100-4.noarch
fonts-chinese-0:2.15-2.noarch
fonts-hebrew-fancy-0:0.101-2.fc4.noarch
fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-0:1.0-14.noarch
fonts-hindi-0:1.10-2.noarch
bitmap-fonts-cjk-0:0.3-4.noarch
fonts-xorg-base-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
dejavu-fonts-0:2.2-3.fc4.noarch
fonts-xorg-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi-0:1.0-14.noarch
fonts-korean-0:1.0.11-4.noarch
fonts-xorg-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-15-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
urw-fonts-0:2.3-1.noarch
fonts-KOI8-R-0:1.0-7.noarch
mplayer-fonts-0:1.1-0.lvn.3.4.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-2-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-KOI8-R-75dpi-0:1.0-7.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-2-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-truetype-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-14-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
bitstream-vera-fonts-0:1.10-5.noarch
mathml-fonts-0:1.0-19.fc4.noarch
[y4kk0@X ~]$

Thanks,
    Dawid

[Tom Callaway]

On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 01:07 +0100, Dawid Gajownik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Houston, we've got a problem ;)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179439#c7
>
> Do we have any naming guidelines concerning packages with fonts? There 
> is some inconsistency:

Any chance you can break those up into Fedora Core and Fedora Extras?

I only have any control over the latter. :)

~spot

[Dawid Gajownik]

Dnia 02/04/2006 01:26 AM, Użytkownik Tom 'spot' Callaway napisał:
> Any chance you can break those up into Fedora Core and Fedora Extras?

Shure :)

[y4kk0@X ~]$ repoquery -qa --repoid=extras | grep fonts
hunky-fonts-0:0.3.1-2.fc4.noarch
gentium-fonts-0:1.02-2.noarch
fonts-hebrew-fancy-0:0.101-2.fc4.noarch
mgopen-fonts-0:0.20050515-1.noarch
mathml-fonts-0:1.0-19.fc4.noarch
dejavu-fonts-0:2.2-3.fc4.noarch
[y4kk0@X ~]$ repoquery -qa --repoid=base | grep fonts
bitmap-fonts-0:0.3-4.noarch
fonts-gujarati-0:1.10-2.noarch
fonts-tamil-0:1.10-2.noarch
fonts-KOI8-R-75dpi-0:1.0-7.noarch
fonts-bengali-0:1.10-2.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-15-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-2-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-14-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-japanese-0:0.20050222-3.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-9-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-syriac-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
ghostscript-fonts-0:5.50-13.noarch
fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi-0:1.0-7.noarch
fonts-arabic-0:1.5-3.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-9-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
tetex-fonts-0:3.0-4.i386
fonts-xorg-cyrillic-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-punjabi-0:1.10-2.noarch
fonts-hebrew-0:0.100-4.noarch
fonts-chinese-0:2.15-2.noarch
fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-0:1.0-14.noarch
fonts-hindi-0:1.10-2.noarch
bitmap-fonts-cjk-0:0.3-4.noarch
fonts-xorg-base-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
taipeifonts-0:1.2-26.noarch
fonts-xorg-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi-0:1.0-14.noarch
fonts-korean-0:1.0.11-4.noarch
fonts-xorg-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-15-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-KOI8-R-0:1.0-7.noarch
kon2-fonts-0:0.3.9b-26.i386
fonts-ISO8859-2-0:1.0-14.noarch
urw-fonts-0:2.3-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-2-75dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-truetype-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
fonts-xorg-ISO8859-14-100dpi-0:6.8.2-1.noarch
bitstream-vera-fonts-0:1.10-5.noarch
[y4kk0@X ~]$
> I only have any control over the latter. :)

IMHO it would be nice to have the same rules in Core and in Extras ;)

Regards,
    Dawid

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le samedi 04 février 2006 à 01:07 +0100, Dawid Gajownik a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> Houston, we've got a problem ;)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179439#c7
>
> Do we have any naming guidelines concerning packages with fonts? There 
> is some inconsistency:

Nothing new, the "problem" was discussed when vera got in fedora.us and
then again when it was merged upstream (you can look up the bugzilla
entries/ ML threads)

FC tends to put fonts- first except when it's a subpackage. This helps
when you do a stupid sort (but in the days of autodep resolvers the use
of basic sort is somehow limited - tools are smarter nowadays)

(Note this is a new rule, for a very long time RHL/FC didn't have any
particular rule)

FE (and yes I have my share of responsibility there) tends to put -fonts
last as its more consistent with english, FC font subpackages and
external repositories (in the vera case bistream-vera-fonts already
existed in the helix gnome repo)

My own take is live and let live, the benefits of harmonising are not
worth the renaming pains.

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 01:07 +0100, Dawid Gajownik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Houston, we've got a problem ;)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179439#c7

I suppose I was a little overzealous in interpreting the Addon Packages
rule at
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-e865dfbf5f....
I honestly don't mind it being -fonts.