On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:52:26AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
But.. if you're suggesting that the regularly-packaged libeoffice
moved out of /usr and into /opt/fedora/apps/libreoffice (or
libreoffice-188.8.131.52 or libreoffice-184.108.40.206-2 or some other variation
incorporating more of the version-release pair) then... that's a big
Yeah, I'm suggesting considering the big deal. That way, we basically
get Flatpaks "for free", with no need for forked specfiles or crazy
specfile macros (or behind-the-scenes slight-of-hand).
Some will say that it really goes against the whole Unix spirit and
organizational setup which we've had for 30+ years. I would agree that
it's a break with history, but hipster-coders raised on /Libraries and
/Applications certainly won't care, and if it carries measurable
benefits (beyond just making something internal to flatpaks easier) then
I think there's certainly an argument to be made for it. (The
possibility of having multiple versions is, for me, enticing.)
It definitely is a change to the organizational setup Fedora has had.
I'm not so sure it goes against the Unix spirit in general -- I'm
certainly used to having all sorts of stuff in /opt from back in my
Really my concern is how you'd deal with the more basic issues:
* How does typing "libreoffice" work? Do you also drop symlinks into
FHS has a provision for /opt/<provider>/bin -- we could put that
/opt/fedora/bin in the default $PATH and use that.
* How do things like desktop configuration, icons and whatnot get
installed where desktops will look for them?
Something similar, I guess. :)
* Can these "apps" provide libraries or content used by
other "apps" or
even just regular programs on the system? How do those other things
actually find the content?
I would suggest no, at least for libraries. Maybe the Modularity
initiative people have a different answer here, though.
* Do you allow multiple versions? How does that change the above
answers? How does ordering work in that case? How do you decide
which version is the "main" one, which gets /usr/bin/libreoffice,
I think allowing multiple versions would be a nice side-effect, but we
*could* say that if you need that, use the Flatpak versions. Maybe the
alternatives system could be used to moderate which version owns the
shared bin link.
I really hope that the answer for the first three is to just add each
these directories to various search paths. That gets hilarious pretty
Yeah, I think that would get out of control. :)
Fedora Project Leader