perl-devel May 2005

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

8 participants
121 discussions

[Bug 129726] hidden error in DB_File::untie causes file descriptor leak
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '05

28 May '05

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hidden error in DB_File::untie causes file descriptor leak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129726 wtogami(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|123268 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-05-28 02:30 EST ------- Is this still an issue in FC3, RHEL4, or FC4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 157695] CAN-2005-0448 perl File::Path.pm rmtree race condition
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '05

28 May '05

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: CAN-2005-0448 perl File::Path.pm rmtree race condition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157695 wtogami(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-05-28 02:05 EST ------- "Race condition in the rmtree function in File::Path.pm in Perl before 5.8.4 allows local users to create arbitrary setuid binaries" 5.8.4 means FC3 is unaffected because we have perl-5.8.5? Can someone confirm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '05

25 May '05

1 0

[Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '05

25 May '05

1 0

[Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '05

25 May '05

1 0

[Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '05

25 May '05

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl(Inline) duplication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158733 ------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2005-05-25 19:47 EST ------- PDL: provides/requires 1) provide: perl(Inline) Caused by the following hack in the file Inline/MakePdlppInstallable.pm ---------- package Inline::MakePdlppInstallable; # just a dummy package package Inline; #==================================================================== # override the original Inline::install method # to allow Inline::Pdlpp code to be installed ... ---------- The above comment goes on and explains why the hack is there. 2) The requirement perl(Inline) appears to be valid unless there is no interest in using Inline::Pdlpp. a) The Inline module is required by the module Inline::Pdlpp (file Inline/Pdlpp.pm) ---------- package Inline::Pdlpp; use strict; require Inline; ... ---------- b) From the Inline::Pdlpp documentation ---------- ... You never actually use Inline::Pdlpp directly. It is just a support module for using Inline.pm with PDL::PP. So the usage is always: use Inline Pdlpp => ...; ... ---------- Source: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDL/Basic/Gen/Inline/Pdlpp.pm#Usage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '05

25 May '05

1 0

[Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '05

25 May '05

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl(Inline) duplication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158733 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2005-05-25 16:42 EST ------- Note that if you just filter out the perl(Inline) Provides here, this package will after the change depend on the perl-Inline package which it did not do earlier, because the autogenerated perl(Inline) dependency will still be there. It should be verified if this is the right thing. Another cosmetic note: if one hardcodes /usr/lib/rpm/perl.(prov|req) and thus theoretically overrides the system rpmbuild configuration, the filter scripts could be separated into files of their own instead of embedding them in the specfile. On the other hand, since they're already embedded, /usr/lib/rpm/perl.(prov|req) could be replaced with %{__perl_provides} and %{__perl_requires} in the emitted scriptlets to make them automatically play nice with possible future rpm config changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '05

25 May '05

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl(Inline) duplication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158733 ------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2005-05-25 16:27 EST ------- --- perl-PDL.spec.241_11 2005-05-12 05:28:34.000000000 +0100 +++ perl-PDL.spec 2005-05-25 21:25:12.000000000 +0100 @@ -34,7 +34,15 @@ %patch0 -p1 -b .settings %patch1 -p1 -b .long -# Explicitly filter perl(Tk) +# Provides: explicitly filter perl(Inline) +cat <<__EOF__ > %{name}-findperlprovides +#!/bin/sh +/usr/lib/rpm/perl.prov $* | grep -v 'perl(Inline)' +__EOF__ +%define __perl_provides %{_builddir}/PDL-%{version}/%{name}-findperlprovides +chmod +x %{__perl_provides} + +# Requires: explicitly filter perl(Tk) cat <<__EOF__ > %{name}-findperlrequires #!/bin/sh /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req $* | grep -v 'perl(Tk)' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '05

25 May '05

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl(Inline) duplication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158733 wtogami(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-05-25 15:35 EST ------- Recommendations? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
13
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel May 2005