Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Misnamed package, add Provides?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165885
------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2005-08-16 03:11 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I thought that the package naming guidelines would have adviced to use
> perl-$CPANDIST, but instead it goes on to say things about "the CPAN module
> name".
Can we agree upon this and make this mandatory for FE?
Is there consenus on this?
> IMO, that makes no sense because the unit of CPAN module packaging is a CPAN
> _distribution_, and the vast majority those distributions contain more than
> one module. What's "the CPAN module name" then? Just using the CPAN
> distribution name would work, and is already used in all CPAN packages I'm
> aware of.
I would not bet on FC, but I guess, you are right as far as FE is concerned.
How to proceed with this package?
1. Apply cvs tricks (I.e. an admin moving the files in CVS)?
2. Re-import the package into CVS under "perl-gettext" and "cvs rm"
perl-Locale-gettext?
3. Let it be in FC-4 and re-import it as "perl-gettext" into "devel"?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165907
------- Additional Comments From altblue(a)n0i.net 2005-08-15 13:34 EST -------
as for the other patches: 26 was fixed by change 24180 and 27 by change 23918.
(no idea about 11, i don't use it).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165907
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |150222
nThis| |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165907
------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2005-08-14 17:46 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=117724)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=117724&action=view)
Third perl specfile patch - comments four perl patches
The release number is intentionally 0 (zero) as this perl specfile patch has to
temporarily disable the following perl patches:
Patch11: perl-5.8.3-fullinc.patch
Patch12: perl-5.8.6-incpush.patch
# CAN-2004-0452 fix
Patch26: perl-5.8.0-rmtree.patch
# CAN-2005-0155 and CAN-2005-0156 fix
Patch27: perl-5.8.5-CAN-2005-0155+0156.patch
Any volunteers to review the above patches?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165907
------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2005-08-14 10:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> ... I want to avoid the case of the version of obsoleted
> perl-subpackage modules going backwards temporarily.
Can you be more specific? Which perl-subpackage/module would be going backwards?
Additional info about Perl and core modules versions
(source: corelist):
Perl Filter::Simple Filter::Util::Call Time::HiRes
5.008005 0.78 1.0601 1.59
5.008006 0.78 1.0601 1.65
5.008007 0.78 1.0601 1.66
FC4 - Perl core modules in external packages
perl-Filter-1.30-7.i386.rpm
* includes Filter::Util::Call version 1.06
perl-Filter-Simple-0.79-5.noarch.rpm
perl-Time-HiRes-1.65-1.i386.rpm
Example of strange dependencies
$ rpm -q --whatrequires "perl(Filter::Util::Call)"
perl-5.8.6-15
$ rpm -q --whatprovides "perl(Filter::Util::Call)"
perl-Filter-1.30-7
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165907
------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2005-08-14 10:01 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Re comment 2: what harm does "prints a message" do if "make install" is run
> before "make test"?
None.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: [PATCH] Perl is build with debugging support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156113
ville.skytta(a)iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Perl is build with debugging|[PATCH] Perl is build with
|support |debugging support
Keywords| |Patch
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2005-08-14 05:20 EST -------
Warren, while you're rolling the Rawhide Perl updates, could you slip this one
in (patch in comment 1) so more people could start testing?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165907
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2005-08-14 05:17 EST -------
Re comment 2: what harm does "prints a message" do if "make install" is run
before "make test"?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Parse directory not owned by perl-Parse-Yapp-1.05-32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165857
ville.skytta(a)iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
Fixed In Version| |1.05-33
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2005-08-14 05:14 EST -------
Warren probably meant to close this one too as a part of yesterday's batch;
I'm pretty certain that this won't be fixed for FC3 if it's the only thing
needing an update in the package. The dir ownerships have already been fixed
in FC4+.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.