Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167901
Summary: what about perl-Filter and perl-Filter-Simple
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: laroche(a)redhat.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,sopwith@redhat.com
Description of problem:
The newest perl package has fileconflicts with perl-Filter and
perl-Filter-Simple. Can those two be deleted from FC-development
trees?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl headers are incompletely built
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71513
------- Additional Comments From kjetilho(a)ifi.uio.no 2005-09-12 10:40 EST -------
sys/syscall.ph works, errno.ph doesn't. this is with perl-5.8.6-15
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: [PATCH] libperl leaks a THREAD_KEY each time it is reloaded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73486
jorton(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
------- Additional Comments From jorton(a)redhat.com 2005-09-12 06:15 EST -------
Yup looks that way, which seems fine it's not very critical.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: DateManip complains of Malformed UTF-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74884
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
CC| |fedora-perl-devel-
| |list(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:42 EST -------
Is "non-UTF-8 string literals were inside comments" still fatal in modern perl,
and if so would something like the above script be useful in an automated test
to avoid this problem in our future perl packages?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73908
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product|Red Hat Linux |Fedora Core
Version|8.0 |devel
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|perl-Crypt-SSLeay |perl-Crypt-SSLeay
CC| |fedora-perl-devel-
| |list(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:35 EST -------
This package has not been cleaned up since then, so likely still needs fixing.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Does not work when installed with an umask of 077 and messes filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73921
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product|Red Hat Linux |Fedora Core
Version|8.0 |devel
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|perl-RPM2 |perl-RPM2
CC| |fedora-perl-devel-
| |list(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:28 EST -------
Spec has not been rewritten to modern perl packaging standards, so likely still
affected.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: [PATCH] libperl leaks a THREAD_KEY each time it is reloaded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73486
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Perl segfault after many |[PATCH] libperl leaks a
|reloads |THREAD_KEY each time it is
| |reloaded
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:14 EST -------
Has perl-5.8.7 fixed this issue?
So FC3 and FC4 are affected but not FC5?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl headers are incompletely built
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71513
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO
CC| |fedora-perl-devel-
| |list(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:11 EST -------
List, is this still an issue?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Perl doesn't look for modules in /usr/local
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:07 EST -------
Closing due to lack of response. There is a newer report somewhere asking for
this elsewhere.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl(Inline) duplication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158733
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-09-11 07:06 EST -------
Attempted build again today. Only one test failure on ppc:
t/primitive.................# Failed test 20 in t/primitive.t at line 120
# t/primitive.t line 120 is: eval '$c = all($b==pdl([[0,1],[2,2]]))'; ok(!$@
&& $c);
FAILED test 20
Upstream CPAN shows mostly failures on this module version, and seems unwilling
or unable to fix this module after a few months of failure. So this leaves us
with few options:
1) Disable tests and allow this to go into rawhide, assuming it is only a
problem of the tests themselves (?)
2) Downgrade to the previous version and hope that it works.
3) Fix the problem, whatever it is.
Opinions?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.