perl-devel January 2006

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
47 discussions

[Bug 176717] New: perl-File-MMagic: update request to 1.25
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jan '06

17 Jan '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176717 Summary: perl-File-MMagic: update request to 1.25 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-MMagic/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-File-MMagic AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rawhide: perl-File-MMagic-1.22-1.1.src.rpm Expected results: perl-File-MMagic 1.25 in rawhide Additional info: Diff from File-MMagic-1.22 to File-MMagic-1.25 http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=File-MMagic-1.22&to=File-MMagic-1.25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 176718] New: perl-Devel-Symdump: update request to 2.04
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jan '06

17 Jan '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176718 Summary: perl-Devel-Symdump: update request to 2.04 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-Symdump/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Devel-Symdump AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rawhide: perl-Devel-Symdump-2.03-20.1.src.rpm Expected results: perl-Devel-Symdump 2.04 in rawhide Additional info: Diff from Devel-Symdump-2.03 to Devel-Symdump-2.04 http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=Devel-Symdump-2.03&to=Devel-Symdump-2.04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 176720] New: perl-HTML-Tagset: update request to 3.10
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jan '06

17 Jan '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176720 Summary: perl-HTML-Tagset: update request to 3.10 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Tagset/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-HTML-Tagset AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: New version in CPAN; WARNING WARNING New module maintainer -> the source URL must be changed WARNING Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rawhide: perl-HTML-Tagset-3.04-2.1.src.rpm Expected results: Version 3.10 in rawhide. Additional info: Diff from HTML-Tagset-3.04 to HTML-Tagset-3.10 http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=HTML-Tagset-3.04&to=HTML-Tagset-3.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 176721] New: perl-RPm-Specfile: update request to 1.19
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jan '06

17 Jan '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176721 Summary: perl-RPm-Specfile: update request to 1.19 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/RPM-Specfile/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-RPM-Specfile AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rawhide: perl-RPM-Specfile-1.17-2.src.rpm Expected results: version 1.19 in rawhide Additional info: Diff from RPM-Specfile-1.17 to RPM-Specfile-1.19 http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=RPM-Specfile-1.17&to=RPM-Specfile-1.19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jan '06

17 Jan '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amavisd-new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167354 ------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net 2006-01-17 03:25 EST ------- Thanks Tom. Ville: I'm not going to approve a perl package which processes insecure data. At least not before taking a few perl tutorials/courses first. You can call me paranoïd if you like, but perl is very low in my trust scale, and I don't know it enough to do an educated evaluation. (and yes I'm ready to trust my own data to a package I wouldn't approve - but then I've been running rawhide for more years I care to remember now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jan '06

17 Jan '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amavisd-new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167354 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2006-01-17 01:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > (still happily running Steve's original package 24h/24 7j/j since last september > at least without any hitch - can't anyone approve this?) You know you could have done that yourself, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jan '06

16 Jan '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amavisd-new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167354 tcallawa(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk(a)redhat.com |tcallawa(a)redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa(a)redhat.com 2006-01-16 23:21 EST ------- Since there are no obvious showstoppers in this bug ticket, I'll review this: Good: - rpmlint checks return: E: amavisd-new non-standard-uid /var/spool/amavisd/db amavis E: amavisd-new non-standard-gid /var/spool/amavisd/db amavis E: amavisd-new non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/amavisd/db 0700 W: amavisd-new dangling-relative-symlink /usr/sbin/clamd.amavisd clamd E: amavisd-new non-standard-uid /var/spool/amavisd amavis E: amavisd-new non-standard-gid /var/spool/amavisd amavis E: amavisd-new non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/amavisd 0700 E: amavisd-new non-standard-uid /var/run/amavisd amavis E: amavisd-new non-standard-gid /var/run/amavisd amavis E: amavisd-new non-standard-uid /var/spool/amavisd/tmp amavis E: amavisd-new non-standard-gid /var/spool/amavisd/tmp amavis E: amavisd-new non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/amavisd/tmp 0700 E: amavisd-new init-script-name-with-dot /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.amavisd E: amavisd-new no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.amavisd W: amavisd-new no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.amavisd E: amavisd-new subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.amavisd E: amavisd-new incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/amavisd ${prog_base} I think all of these are safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jan '06

16 Jan '06

1 0

[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jan '06

16 Jan '06

1 0

Provides: perl(main)
by Ralf Corsepius 16 Jan '06

16 Jan '06

Hi, I just tripped several perl-packages in Fedora, which Provide: perl(main) AFAIS, most of them originate from perl modules using package main; somewhere in their code. I am inclined to consider letting rpms "provide: perl(main)" as packaging bug (perl(main) should better be filtered out for them), but am not sure about it. A quick check on my FC4+FE4 systems reveals these packages: # rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(main)' mod_perl-2.0.1-1.fc4 perl-MIME-tools-5.417-2 perl-HTML-Tree-3.18-3 latex2html-2002.2.1-3 perl-Parse-RecDescent-1.94-5 perl-5.8.6-22 Ralf

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel January 2006