[Bug 208731] New: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731
Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6test3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
>From Jose on fedora-perl-devel-list:
Removing support for perl 5.8.3 and perl 5.8.4 reduces the number
of directories in the perl search path (@INC), which improves the
perl modules loading time.
This has already been done in past for FC-4 where support for
perl 5.8.0/5.8.1/5.8.2 has dropped.
perl specfile patch:
--------------------
--- perl.spec.588_8 2006-07-14 22:22:06.000000000 +0100
+++ perl.spec 2006-09-17 16:10:58.000000000 +0100
@@ -26,9 +26,7 @@
Provides: perl(:WITHOUT_THREADS)
%endif
-%define perlmodcompat 5.8.7 5.8.6 5.8.5 5.8.4 5.8.3
-Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.3)
-Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.4)
+%define perlmodcompat 5.8.7 5.8.6 5.8.5
Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.5)
Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)
Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.7)
--------------------
Note:
The FC-4 change was reported in the Release Notes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 205562] New: maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205562
Summary: maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB)
Product: Fedora Core
Version: test3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl-Crypt-SSLeay
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: pertusus(a)free.fr
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I found by chance that perl-Crypt-SSLeay provides perl(DB),
which is also provided by perl. So, at the first sight,
it seems that there is something wrong. I haven't
investigated more, so it may be completly right for
perl-Crypt-SSLeay to provide perl(DB), if it is the case
sorry for the noise....
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 100786] DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100786
bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|enhancement |normal
Keywords| |FutureFeature
notting(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED
Resolution| |CANTFIX
------- Additional Comments From notting(a)redhat.com 2006-10-18 14:05 EST -------
Red Hat Linux is no longer supported by Red Hat, Inc. If you are still
running Red Hat Linux, you are strongly advised to upgrade to a
current Fedora Core release or Red Hat Enterprise Linux or comparable.
Some information on which option may be right for you is available at
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/migrate/redhatlinux/.
Red Hat apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We do
want to make sure that no important bugs slip through the cracks.
If this issue is still present in a current Fedora Core release, please
open a new bug with the relevant information.
Closing as CANTFIX.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months
Bricolage
by Steven Pritchard
Last year I worked for a while on getting Bricolage packaged. Since I
may never get back to it at the rate I'm going, here's the last spec
that I had:
http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/bricolage/bricolage.spec
(That's really the spec for 1.8.6, but apparently I had started to
update it for 1.9.0 at one point.)
The only problem with Bricolage is it doesn't work on
apache2/mod_perl2. I had a brute-force, untested port here:
https://svn.bricolage.cc/bricolage/branches/dev_apache2/
Development has moved on since then (obviously), so that may not be
useful at this point. Besides, upstream *really* wants a solution
that makes Bricolage work on either mod_perl 1 or 2. (There were some
discussions about that on the Bricolage devel list last year.)
The only dependencies that don't seem to be available right now are
these:
perl(Apache::SizeLimit)
perl(Cache::Mmap)
perl(Devel::Profiler) >= 0.03
perl(HTTP::DAV)
perl(MasonX::Interp::WithCallbacks) >= 1.10
perl(Net::FTPServer)
perl(Net::SFTP) >= 0.08
perl(Params::CallbackRequest) >= 1.10
perl(Term::ReadPassword)
perl(Test::Class) >= 0.04
perl(Test::File::Contents)
perl(Text::Aspell)
perl(XML::Writer)
I think I've had packages for all of these (except Apache::SizeLimit,
which is a apache1 thing IIRC) lingering in my queue for a year or so.
I'll try to get them all submitted soon.
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve(a)kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 200440] New: Building perl-5.8.8-8 without threading fails
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200440
Summary: Building perl-5.8.8-8 without threading fails
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dansut(a)tcnow.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Building perl-5.8.8-8 without threading fails with a straightfoward syntax error.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.8-8
How reproducible:
easy
Steps to Reproduce:
1. change %define threading 0
2. rpmbuild -ba perl.spec
Additional info:
Problem is in the perl-5.8.8-R-switch.patch
Where S_init_perllib()definition changed the 'pTHX,' should be 'pTHX_'
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 191416] New: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191416
Summary: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A ||
defined B'
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39130
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jvdias(a)redhat.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,prockai(a)redhat.com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #191409 +++
Description of problem:
This is perlbug #39130 - see URL .
For cpp statements like :
#if defined A || defined B
h2ph would generate the code :
if(defined (defined(&A) ? &A : 0) || defined (defined(&B) ? &B : 0)) {
which is tautologous, as defined(0) is always true .
This turns out to cause real problems on the Linux ppc64 platform,
where "endian-ness" is selectable in the compiler; every inclusion
of "endian.ph", which includes "bits/endian.ph", generates an error:
$ perl -e 'require "sys/socket.ph";'
Both BIG_ENDIAN and LITTLE_ENDIAN defined! at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/bits/endian.ph line 10.
Compilation failed in require at...
Because h2ph generated this code in ../bits/endian.ph:
if(defined (defined(&__BIG_ENDIAN__) ? &__BIG_ENDIAN__ : 0) || defined
(defined(&_BIG_ENDIAN) ? &_BIG_ENDIAN : 0)) {
if(defined (defined(&__LITTLE_ENDIAN__) ? &__LITTLE_ENDIAN__ : 0) || defined
(defined(&_LITTLE_ENDIAN) ? &_LITTLE_ENDIAN : 0)) {
die("Both\ BIG_ENDIAN\ and\ LITTLE_ENDIAN\ defined\!");
}
For the cpp code in /usr/include/bits/endian.h:
#if defined __BIG_ENDIAN__ || defined _BIG_ENDIAN
# if defined __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ || defined _LITTLE_ENDIAN
# error Both BIG_ENDIAN and LITTLE_ENDIAN defined!
...
The problem does not happen if the 'defined..' conditions are in parentheses -
ie.
#if defined(A) || defined(B)
produces correct code:
if( defined(&A) || defined(&B) )
A trivial fix for this is to simply replace the ': 0' with ': undef' in
h2ph.PL line 517, as with this patch:
--- perl-5.8.8/utils/h2ph.PL~ 2006-01-12 17:55:04.000000000 -0500
+++ perl-5.8.8/utils/h2ph.PL 2006-05-11 13:50:04.000000000 -0400
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@
}
} else {
if ($inif && $new !~ /defined\s*\($/) {
- $new .= '(defined(&' . $id . ') ? &' . $id . ' : 0)';
+ $new .= '(defined(&' . $id . ') ? &' . $id . ' : undef)';
} elsif (/^\[/) {
$new .= " \$$id";
} else {
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ALL
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
On a ppc64 platform with select-able endian-ness:
# perl -e 'require "sys/socket.ph";'
Actual results:
Both BIG_ENDIAN and LITTLE_ENDIAN defined! at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/bits/endian.ph line 10.
Compilation failed in require at...
Expected results:
no error
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 199152] New: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199152
Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm
Product: Red Hat Web Application Stack
Version: LAMPv1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jvdias(a)redhat.com
QAContact: gozen(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,jorton(a)redhat.com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #188441 +++
Description of problem:
url(-relative) no longer returns the original relative path before rewrites.
This used to work in FC4.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.8-4
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set up a redirect in your .htaccess file such as:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^testabc.cgi$ test.cgi
2. Create a test perl script, test.cgi such as:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use CGI qw/:standard -no_xhtml/;
print "Content-type: text/plain\n\n";
print url(-relative=>1), "\n";
print url(-absolute=>1), "\n";
3. Look at the web page /testabc.cgi
Actual results:
test.cgi
/testabc.cgi
Expected results:
testabc.cgi
/testabc.cgi
Additional info:
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-04-12 17:16 EST --
Hmmm, this does not seem to be a problem with perl's CGI:: module -
I put your rewrite rule in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf's /var/www/cgi-bin/
'Directory' entry, from the standard config from a clean install of
httpd-2.2.0-6 , so it now reads:
---
<Directory "/var/www/cgi-bin">
AllowOverride None
Options FollowSymLinks
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /cgi-bin
RewriteRule ^testabc.cgi$ test.cgi
</Directory>
---
NOTE: before the server would process the rewrite rule, it insisted that
the FollowSymLinks or FollowSymLinks owner option be specified - without
one of these options enabled, rewrite rules will be ignored.
Then your example test.cgi script works as expected, producing the output:
testabc.cgi
/testabc.cgi
Perhaps your http server is not loading your .htaccess file correctly /
doesn't allow the FollowSymLinks or RewriteRule options ?
I'm CC-ing the httpd maintainer on this - perhaps he could shed some light on
why the rewrite rule might not be taking effect.
If the rewrite rule is correctly applied, the perl CGI module seems to have
no problem with url(-relative=>1) / url(-absolute=>1) .
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-04-12 17:49 EST --
Sorry - my mistake - I was looking at the wrong output - it does produce :
test.cgi
/testabc.cgi.
This is a CPAN CGI module bug:
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=18500
I'll try out the patch from the above bug (now in CGI 3.17) and see if it
fixes the problem - if so, it can go into the next perl-5.8.8-6+ release.
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-04-12 18:53 EST --
OK, I now see the problem - CGI.pm-3.15 has a new "-rewrite" sub url() parameter,
which, if 0, is meant to make url() return the "$SCRIPT_NAME", not the
"$REQUEST_URI". It seems the programmer applies this logic only in the
case of '-absolute=>1', NOT '-relative=>1'. Yes, this seems like a bug
to me - and is still in the latest 3.17 version.
Please try out the attached CGI.pm which fixes the problem - if it works OK,
I'll submit it with the next perl-5.8.8-6 version.
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-04-12 18:54 EST --
Created an attachment (id=127678)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=127678&action=view)
CGI.pm (3.15) fixed to use rewritten REQUEST_URI in url() if rewrite!=0
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-04-12 18:55 EST --
Sorry, should have mentioned: copy the above CGI.pm attachment to
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/CGI.pm to test.
-- Additional comment from bruno(a)wolff.to on 2006-04-12 22:26 EST --
I tried this out and it looks like it is working. Thanks.
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-04-13 16:30 EST --
Thanks for the testing. The fix is now checked into CVS and will go into the
next perl-5.8.8-6 release.
Upstream CPAN CGI.pm bug raised: [rt.cpan.org #18692]
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18692
-- Additional comment from updates(a)fedora.redhat.com on 2006-06-05 17:00 EST --
perl-5.8.8-5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these
problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 185406] New: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185406
Summary: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Version: 4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jvdias(a)redhat.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,prockai(a)redhat.com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #178343 +++
Description of problem:
> Subject: h2ph problem
> From: George Michaelson <ggm(a)apnic.net>
> To: jvdias(a)redhat.com
> Date: 2006-01-17 19:54
>
> We just got bitten by 32bit vs 64bit logic in the .ph files generated
> from socket.h/stddef.h/limits.h -bits/socket.ph to be exact.
>
> Undefined subroutine &main::__LONG_MAX__ called at (eval 436) line 1.
> Compilation failed in require at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/sy s/socket.ph line 11.
> Compilation failed in require at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-threa d-multi/netinet/in.ph line
> 9.
>
>
> By removing some if/then/else logic, to make it just eval() the 32-bit
> case, the problem went away.
>
> this was after applying an up2date on EL4 for perl 5.8.5:
>
> [ggm@curry log]$ uname -a
> Linux curry.apnic.net 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Oct 18 18:39:27 EDT
> 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [ggm@curry log]$ rpmquery -a | grep perl
> newt-perl-1.08-7
> mod_perl-1.99_16-4
> perl-Net-DNS-0.48-1
> perl-Time-HiRes-1.55-3
> perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4
> perl-Filter-1.30-6
> perl-URI-1.30-4
> perl-Digest-SHA1-2.07-5
> perl-Digest-HMAC-1.01-13
> [ggm@curry log]$
>
> the RPM errata lists
>
> > * Tue Nov 01 2005 Jason Vas Dias <jvdias(a)redhat.com> - 3:5.8.5-17.RHEL4
> > - fix bug 170088: broken h2ph fixed with h2ph from 5.8.7
> > - fix bug 171111 / upstream bug 37535: IOCPARM_LEN should be _IOC_SIZE
> > - fix bug 172236: make h2ph pick up gcc built-in include directory
>
> Is it possible you haven't tested enough of the outcomes here? Without
> this, the perl just doesn't work.
>
> -George
>
> --- socket.ph.dist 2006-01-17 16:44:41.000000000 +1000
> +++ socket.ph 2006-01-17 16:44:49.000000000 +1000
> @@ -90,11 +90,7 @@
> eval 'sub SOL_IRDA () {266;}' unless defined(&SOL_IRDA);
> eval 'sub SOMAXCONN () {128;}' unless defined(&SOMAXCONN);
> require 'bits/sockaddr.ph';
> - if((defined(&ULONG_MAX) ? &ULONG_MAX : 0) > 0xffffffff) {
> - eval 'sub __ss_aligntype () { &__uint64_t;}' unless
> defined(&__ss_aligntype); - } else {
> eval 'sub __ss_aligntype () { &__uint32_t;}' unless
> defined(&__ss_aligntype); - }
> eval 'sub _SS_SIZE () {128;}' unless defined(&_SS_SIZE);
> eval 'sub _SS_PADSIZE () {( &_SS_SIZE - (2* $sizeof{
> &__ss_aligntype}));}' unless defined(&_SS_PADSIZE); eval("sub MSG_OOB () {
> 0x01; }") unless defined(&MSG_OOB);
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ALL - including RHEL-4 perl-5.8.5-*
not a problem with RHEL-3 perl-5.8.0, because gcc-3.2.3's limits.h #defines
things like __LONG_MAX__
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
$ perl -e 'require "sys/socket.ph";'
Actual results:
Undefined subroutine &main::__LONG_MAX__ called at (eval 256) line 1.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/sys/socket.ph line 11.
Compilation failed in require at -e line 1.
Expected results:
no errors
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-01-19 12:20 EST --
Now that h2ph correctly picks up the gcc C standard includes, such as limits.h,
from the gcc internal include directory (ie. /usr/lib/gcc/*.../include),
which it was not doing before, due to bug 172236, some perl .ph files cannot be
included because they refer to the newer gcc versions 'internal definitions' such
as __INT_MAX__ / __LONG_MAX__ , which are no longer #define'd in any header file,
but are 'built-in' to the newer gcc compilers, in the same way as __FILE__ or
__LINE__ :
$ echo 'int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
{ long l=__LONG_MAX__; printf( "%ld\n",l); };' >tlm.c
( NOTE: no files are #include-ed )
$ gcc -o tlm tlm.c$ gcc -o tlm tlm.c
tlm.c: In function ‘main’:
tlm.c:1: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘printf’
$ ./tlm
2147483647
gcc's C standard headers define constants such as LONG_MAX / INT_MAX in terms
of these internal definitions:
$ egrep 'define\ (INT|LONG)_MAX' limits.h
#define INT_MAX __INT_MAX__
#define LONG_MAX __LONG_MAX__
During the generation of the perl platform h2ph includes, we should create a
file included by limits.ph that includes definitions for all the gcc
'internal definitions' such as __LONG_MAX__ that might be referenced .
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-01-19 12:57 EST --
Created an attachment (id=123451)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=123451&action=view)
Program to produce perl header for C built-in definitions
Something like the output of this program needs to be prepended to limits.ph
during the build of the perl h2ph platform headers .
-- Additional comment from rc040203(a)freenet.de on 2006-01-19 13:15 EST --
I must be missing something, but why do you try to extract GCC proprietary,
internals?
#include <limits.h> and printing the corresponding POSIX defines would be portable.
C.f. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/limits.h.html
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-01-19 15:54 EST --
RE: Comment #3:
/usr/include/limits.h just #includes' gcc's limits.h, unless '__GNUC__ < 2',
and gcc's limits.h would in any case be found first in by a
'#include <limits.h>' .
The whole issue of h2ph and perl's platform includes needs a major revamp, which
it will get once perl-5.8.8 comes out (soon, I hope).
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-01-31 13:07 EST --
OK, it wasn't fixed in 5.8.8. I've now raised upstream perl bug
#38385 : http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38385
on this issue, which includes a patch to fix it.
This will be fixed in the next perl releases for RHEL-4, FC-4, and FC-5
(RHEL-3 is unaffected).
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-02-02 18:15 EST --
Created an attachment (id=124075)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=124075&action=view)
Program to include cpp internal built-in macros in system _h2ph_pre.ph
-- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-02-02 18:21 EST --
This problem is fixed with perl-5.8.8-1 in FC-5, with the patch sent upstream,
which checks for the existence of cpp internal built-ins in Configure, and
writes them to $Config{cppsymbols} so they are correctly written to _h2ph_pre.pl.
This patch will be applied to subsequent perl releases for FC-4 and RHEL-4 ,
but this problem probably does not warrant a complete perl respin just to fix it.
Meanwhile, simply run the 'patch_h2ph_pre.pl' script attached above, as root,
and the system _h2ph_pre.ph (which gets included by every perl header file) will
be patched to define cpp built-ins it does not already define .
-- Additional comment from updates(a)fedora.redhat.com on 2006-03-13 17:12 EST --
>From User-Agent: XML-RPC
perl-5.8.6-24 has been pushed for FC4, which should resolve this issue. If
these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in
this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months