perl-devel October 2006

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
55 discussions

recently orphaned perl modules....
by Chris Weyl 03 Oct '06

03 Oct '06

Hey all -- As the perl/extras SIG, do we want to have a process in place to pick up orphaned perl modules? That is, there are a number of modules that have been orphaned as part of the recent extras mass-rebuild effort... Rather than let them be removed for FC-6, I think there are benefits to our taking them over. But, if we decide this is a good idea, there are process questions here. Plan A: * SIG member announces intention to do a SIG takeover on this list * announce SIG takeover of orphan per usual process a day later * edit owners.list: list email as owner, actual person doing the taking as cc Plan B: ...erm. Someone else gets to suggest this :) Good idea? Bad? Yes? No? -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia

3 4

[Bug 207430] New: perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Oct '06

03 Oct '06

1 3

[Bug 199149] New: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Oct '06

03 Oct '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199149 Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released Product: Red Hat Web Application Stack Version: LAMPv1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jvdias(a)redhat.com QAContact: gozen(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #194077 +++ Description of problem: These upstream perl bugs / issue have beed fixed in the upstream 5.8.x maintenance release of perl since perl-5.8.8 was released: o 38454 - 'rindex corrects for $[ on bytes rather than UTF-8' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=38454 apply upstream patch #27116 o 24816 - 'Magic vars seem unsure if they are purely numeric' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=24816 ( perl -wle 'print $? = $? ^ "3"' -> 'Argument "^C" isn't numeric' ) apply upstream patch #27391 o Avoid writing over the input string in the case 'F' in moreswitches. apply upstream patch #27426 o 34925 - 'overload and rebless' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=34925 apply upstream patches #27509, #27512 o 34297: 'utf8 overload stringify bug (utf8 caching maybe)' upstream patch #28006 applied o 3038 - '$qr = qr/^a$/m; $x =~ $qr; fails' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=3038 apply upstream patch #27604 o apply upstream patch #27605 - 'Fix off-by-one in $0 set magic.' o 23141 - '($_) = () fails to set $_ to undef' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=23141 apply upstream patch #27914 o 38619 - 'Bug in lc and uc (interaction between UTF-8, substr, and lc/uc)' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=38619 apply upstream patch #27329 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-4 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: See upstream bug reports and the new RHTS test cases in CVS perl/perl-tests/FC6 . -- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-06-05 13:36 EST -- Fixed in perl-5.8.8-6 (FC-6) and perl-5.8.8-5 (FC5). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 178343] New: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '06

01 Oct '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178343 Summary: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jvdias(a)redhat.com QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: > Subject: h2ph problem > From: George Michaelson <ggm(a)apnic.net> > To: jvdias(a)redhat.com > Date: 2006-01-17 19:54 > > We just got bitten by 32bit vs 64bit logic in the .ph files generated > from socket.h/stddef.h/limits.h -bits/socket.ph to be exact. > > Undefined subroutine &main::__LONG_MAX__ called at (eval 436) line 1. > Compilation failed in require at > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/sy s/socket.ph line 11. > Compilation failed in require at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-threa d-multi/netinet/in.ph line > 9. > > > By removing some if/then/else logic, to make it just eval() the 32-bit > case, the problem went away. > > this was after applying an up2date on EL4 for perl 5.8.5: > > [ggm@curry log]$ uname -a > Linux curry.apnic.net 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Oct 18 18:39:27 EDT > 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [ggm@curry log]$ rpmquery -a | grep perl > newt-perl-1.08-7 > mod_perl-1.99_16-4 > perl-Net-DNS-0.48-1 > perl-Time-HiRes-1.55-3 > perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4 > perl-Filter-1.30-6 > perl-URI-1.30-4 > perl-Digest-SHA1-2.07-5 > perl-Digest-HMAC-1.01-13 > [ggm@curry log]$ > > the RPM errata lists > > > * Tue Nov 01 2005 Jason Vas Dias <jvdias(a)redhat.com> - 3:5.8.5-17.RHEL4 > > - fix bug 170088: broken h2ph fixed with h2ph from 5.8.7 > > - fix bug 171111 / upstream bug 37535: IOCPARM_LEN should be _IOC_SIZE > > - fix bug 172236: make h2ph pick up gcc built-in include directory > > Is it possible you haven't tested enough of the outcomes here? Without > this, the perl just doesn't work. > > -George > > --- socket.ph.dist 2006-01-17 16:44:41.000000000 +1000 > +++ socket.ph 2006-01-17 16:44:49.000000000 +1000 > @@ -90,11 +90,7 @@ > eval 'sub SOL_IRDA () {266;}' unless defined(&SOL_IRDA); > eval 'sub SOMAXCONN () {128;}' unless defined(&SOMAXCONN); > require 'bits/sockaddr.ph'; > - if((defined(&ULONG_MAX) ? &ULONG_MAX : 0) > 0xffffffff) { > - eval 'sub __ss_aligntype () { &__uint64_t;}' unless > defined(&__ss_aligntype); - } else { > eval 'sub __ss_aligntype () { &__uint32_t;}' unless > defined(&__ss_aligntype); - } > eval 'sub _SS_SIZE () {128;}' unless defined(&_SS_SIZE); > eval 'sub _SS_PADSIZE () {( &_SS_SIZE - (2* $sizeof{ > &__ss_aligntype}));}' unless defined(&_SS_PADSIZE); eval("sub MSG_OOB () { > 0x01; }") unless defined(&MSG_OOB); Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ALL - including RHEL-4 perl-5.8.5-* not a problem with RHEL-3 perl-5.8.0, because gcc-3.2.3's limits.h #defines things like __LONG_MAX__ How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: $ perl -e 'require "sys/socket.ph";' Actual results: Undefined subroutine &main::__LONG_MAX__ called at (eval 256) line 1. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/sys/socket.ph line 11. Compilation failed in require at -e line 1. Expected results: no errors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 11

[Bug 188441] New: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '06

01 Oct '06

1 13

[Bug 172396] multi-threaded perl builds use localtime_r which does not call tzset
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '06

01 Oct '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: multi-threaded perl builds use localtime_r which does not call tzset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172396 rnorwood(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias(a)redhat.com |rnorwood(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood(a)redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:32 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 137202] getXXXent functions blow up after recursing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '06

01 Oct '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: getXXXent functions blow up after recursing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137202 rnorwood(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias(a)redhat.com |rnorwood(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood(a)redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:32 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 175459] wrong coding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '06

01 Oct '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: wrong coding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175459 rnorwood(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias(a)redhat.com |rnorwood(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood(a)redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:31 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 142837] Need site-specific man page directory
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '06

01 Oct '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Need site-specific man page directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=142837 rnorwood(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jvdias(a)redhat.com |rnorwood(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood(a)redhat.com 2006-10-01 19:30 EST ------- assigning to rnorwood(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 172739] New: Deep recursion in CGI::Carp::warn
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '06

01 Oct '06

1 4

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel October 2006