February 2006 - perl-devel - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Feb '06

27 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spiffy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183028 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-02-27 14:52 EST ------- Look, he's trying to come up with a solution that doesn't involve hacking 130 downstream packages. If you don't want to be constructive then please just don't post. Steve, I'm working on filtering the requires and it's really simple; you just need six lines in %prep. Looking through what other packages in Core and Extras do, I see that this is really very common: cat << EOF > %{name}-req #!/bin/sh %{__perl_requires} $* | sed -e '/perl(mixin)/d' EOF %define __perl_requires %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}-req chmod +x %{__perl_requires} (You can also reference an external script as %{SOURCE99} if you find emitting it from the spec distasteful.) Finally, I was hacking on the packages and noticed that Spiffy also provides perl(DB), which I think is broken. (It overrides the super() method in the DB package, and so it has a "package DB" statement which RPM turns into Provides: perl(DB).) This has the capacity to break other things, so Spiffy is definitely going to need a __perl_provides override as well: cat <<XXX > %{name}-prov #!/bin/sh %{__perl_provides} $* | sed -e '/perl(DB)/d' XXX %define __perl_provides %{_builddir}/Spiffy-%{version}/%{name}-prov chmod +x %{__perl_provides} With this, things are working cleanly. I know it's a pain to have to do this in all of the modules, but I think this is going to be the only way to move forward. I will try to get these overrides into the Perl template and I suggest that they get into cpanspec as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Feb '06

27 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spiffy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183028 rc040203(a)freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2006-02-27 13:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Spiffy-0.30-2.src.rpm > > * Mon Feb 27 2006 Steven Pritchard <steve(a)kspei.com> 0.30-2 > - Drop explicit Provides: mixin. > - Add dummy mixin.pm. </sigh> With all due respect, what have you been drinking? One crazyness replacing the next? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

Sub::Uplevel and perl 5.8.8
by Jose Pedro Oliveira 27 Feb '06

27 Feb '06

Hi, The perl module Sub::Uplevel is generating warnings under perl 5.8.8 (this didn't happened with perl 5.8.6 and 5.8.7). I believe something related to caller() must have changed in perl 5.8.8 but I am unable to pinpoint the source of the problem (caller appears to be returning undef in a new situation). These warnings are causing major problems in other packages: * perl-Test-Warn fails to build (test problems) * perl-Test-Exception produces a couple of warnings during the test suite execution * perl-WWW-Mechanize fails to build (test failures) I have a patch already in CVS (perl-Sub-Uplevel devel branch) but I would appreciate feedback before releasing a new build of the perl-Sub-Uplevel. Additional information is available in ticket #182488 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182488) Thanks in advance, jpo -- José Pedro Oliveira * mailto: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo * * gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B *

2 2

[Bug 183099] Provides: perl(main)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '06

26 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provides: perl(main) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183099 ------- Additional Comments From ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com 2006-02-26 18:09 EST ------- Done and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 183099] Provides: perl(main)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '06

26 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provides: perl(main) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183099 ------- Additional Comments From ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com 2006-02-26 10:44 EST ------- Doh! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 135162] Strange error message when connecting to Bugzilla xml-rpc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '06

26 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Strange error message when connecting to Bugzilla xml-rpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135162 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2006-02-26 10:28 EST ------- Seems to work properly now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 183099] Provides: perl(main)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '06

26 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provides: perl(main) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183099 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2006-02-26 10:09 EST ------- It's in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 183099] Provides: perl(main)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '06

26 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provides: perl(main) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183099 ------- Additional Comments From ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com 2006-02-26 10:02 EST ------- I can't find the perl-HTML-Tree SRPM in either the FC-4 tree or Developement? Any pointers? Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 183099] Provides: perl(main)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '06

26 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provides: perl(main) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183099 ------- Additional Comments From ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com 2006-02-26 09:44 EST ------- I'll do the workaround for FC-4 then ;-) I'll read perl-HTML-Tree, like Ralf suggested. Thanks, Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 183099] Provides: perl(main)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '06

26 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provides: perl(main) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183099 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2006-02-26 07:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Shouldn't that be handled by the requires perl script? > > Yes, this is a bug in rpm ... > > Your package provides bogus provides, so > > you can't avoid working around this issue. > > This workaround is needed in <= FC4 only. ... or somebody will have to fix rpm for <= FC4, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 183099] Provides: perl(main)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '06

26 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provides: perl(main) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183099 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2006-02-26 07:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Shouldn't that be handled by the requires perl script? > Yes, this is a bug in rpm ... ...which is fixed in rpm >= 4.4.2-12. A simple rebuild with such a version will fix it, and in fact Sprog-0.14-7.fc5 no longer provides perl(main). $ rpm -q Sprog Sprog-0.14-7.fc5 $ rpm -q --provides Sprog | grep main $ > Agreed, but this doesn't help us NOW. It does for devel. > Your package provides bogus provides, so > you can't avoid working around this issue. This workaround is needed in <= FC4 only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 183099] Provides: perl(main)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '06

26 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provides: perl(main) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183099 rc040203(a)freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2006-02-26 06:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Shouldn't that be handled by the requires perl script? Yes, this is a bug in rpm ... > It should know that this is not the perl RPM. > If it doesn't it should be patched. Agreed, but this doesn't help us NOW. Your package provides bogus provides, so you can't avoid working around this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 174373] New: Perl program crashes on end if prepared statements are used
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Feb '06

20 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174373 Summary: Perl program crashes on end if prepared statements are used Product: Fedora Core Version: fc4 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-DBD-Pg AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pb(a)bieringer.de CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-DE; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050919 Firefox/1.0.7 Description of problem: A specific (not so big) Perl program crashes crashes on a special scenario Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-DBD-Pg-1.41-2 perl-5.8.6-16.fc4 postgresql-8.0.4-2.FC4.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. create a Perl program 2. use DBD::Pg 3. connect to database 4. create some prepare statements like my $statement = "SELECT * FROM table WHERE number = ?"; my $sth_test_select = $dbh->prepare($statement) || die $DBI::errstr; 5. use statements 6. disconnect from database 7. exit Actual Results: Crash: rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [PIPE], [], 8) = 0 send(3, "Q\0\0\0\rrollback\0", 14, 0) = 14 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLERR, revents=POLLIN}], 1, -1) = 1 recv(3, "C\0\0\0\rROLLBACK\0Z\0\0\0\5I", 16384, 0) = 20 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [PIPE], [], 8) = 0 send(3, "X\0\0\0\4", 5, 0) = 5 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0 close(3) = 0 stat64("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", 0x94ce0c8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/locale/locale.alias", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2528, ...}) = 0 mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb7d6c000 read(3, "# Locale name alias data base.\n#"..., 4096) = 2528 read(3, "", 4096) = 0 close(3) = 0 munmap(0xb7d6c000, 4096) = 0 open("/usr/share/locale/en_US.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/locale/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/locale/en.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/locale/en.utf8/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("./auto/DBI/DESTROY.al", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) exit_group(0) = ? Expected Results: If prepare variable would be undef'ed before exit (before oder after disconnect), the crash would no longer occur. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 6

[Bug 179271] New: spamd: SPF: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "type" via package "Net::DNS::RR::TXT"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Feb '06

20 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179271 Summary: spamd: SPF: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "type" via package "Net::DNS::RR::TXT" Product: Fedora Core Version: fc4 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Net-DNS AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aleksander.adamowski.redhat(a)altkom.pl CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050923 Fedora/1.7.12-1.5.1 Description of problem: On an Opteron (x86_64) server, Spamassassin's spamd logs the following error messages every now and then: Jan 28 21:13:06 nmail spamd[2082]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR/TXT.pm line 5, <GEN21> line 32._Compilation failed in require at (eval 55) line 3, <GEN21> line 32. Jan 28 21:16:26 nmail spamd[2073]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/Text/ParseWords.pm line 3, <GEN28> line 32._Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR/TXT.pm line 8, <GEN28> line 32._BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR/TXT.pm line 8, <GEN28> line 32._Compilation failed in require at (eval 56) line 3, <GEN28> line 32. Jan 28 21:20:33 nmail spamd[2078]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___Compilation failed in require at (eval 61) line 3, <GEN39> line 32. Jan 28 21:21:28 nmail spamd[2071]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___Compilation failed in require at (eval 58) line 3, <GEN87> line 33. Jan 28 21:22:14 nmail spamd[2084]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___Compilation failed in require at (eval 58) line 3, <GEN111> line 32. Jan 28 21:27:00 nmail spamd[2082]: SPF: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "new" via package "Net::DNS::RR::TXT" at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR.pm line 260, <GEN118> line 53. Jan 28 21:27:38 nmail spamd[2071]: SPF: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "type" via package "Net::DNS::RR::TXT" at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SPF/Query.pm line 1295, <GEN166> line 79. Jan 28 21:27:44 nmail spamd[2082]: SPF: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "new" via package "Net::DNS::RR::TXT" at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR.pm line 260, <GEN136> line 79. Jan 28 21:35:21 nmail spamd[2072]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR/TXT.pm line 8, <GEN228> line 79._Compilation failed in require at (eval 90) line 3, <GEN228> line 79. Jan 28 21:38:52 nmail spamd[2080]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___Compilation failed in require at (eval 99) line 3, <GEN246> line 32. Jan 28 21:39:00 nmail spamd[2069]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___Compilation failed in require at (eval 115) line 3, <GEN255> line 32. Jan 28 21:39:05 nmail spamd[2072]: SPF: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "new" via package "Net::DNS::RR::TXT" at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR.pm line 260, <GEN262> line 33. Jan 28 21:40:02 nmail spamd[2083]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___Compilation failed in require at (eval 100) line 3, <GEN274> line 33. Jan 28 21:42:50 nmail spamd[2070]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___Compilation failed in require at (eval 91) line 3, <GEN264> line 303. Jan 28 21:43:00 nmail spamd[2075]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR/TXT.pm line 8, <GEN279> line 303._Compilation failed in require at (eval 117) line 3, <GEN279> line 303. Jan 28 21:45:54 nmail spamd[2070]: SPF: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "type" via package "Net::DNS::RR::TXT" at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SPF/Query.pm line 1295, <GEN282> line 79. Jan 28 21:54:57 nmail spamd[2074]: SPF: lookup failed: __alarm___BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR/TXT.pm line 8, <GEN317> line 35._Compilation failed in require at (eval 104) line 3, <GEN317> line 35. Jan 28 21:55:24 nmail spamd[2082]: SPF: lookup failed: Can't locate object method "new" via package "Net::DNS::RR::TXT" at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR.pm line 260, <GEN293> line 36. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Net-DNS-0.49-2, perl-5.8.6-22, spamassassin-3.0.4-2.fc4 How reproducible: Sometimes Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install FC4 and the latest updates on an x86_64 machine 2. Launch SpamAssassin 3. Send some mail from the outside world (untrusted networks) to it 4. Watch the maillog Actual Results: The above errors are logged. Expected Results: No errors are logged and SPF rules are run by SpamAssassin. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 10

[Bug 180767] Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180767 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2006-02-13 04:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Fell free to provide a spec file patch. Or even takeover this package... I don't > want to maintain any perl modules, but needed this one for dvd::rip. I've updated the spec in cvs and had let it rebuild on devel/rawhide. Could you try the fc5-spec with dvd::rip on FC4? If it doesn't break (I can't test it), I'd go ahead an apply the FC5 spec to FC4 and FC3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180767] Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '06

10 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180767 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2006-02-10 10:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=124497) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=124497&action=view) Proposed patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180767] Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '06

10 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180767 rc040203(a)freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2006-02-10 09:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Fell free to provide a spec file patch. Or even takeover this package... > I don't want to maintain any perl modules I am already maintaining too many packages and am not really interested taking over this particular package. Anyway, I just just had a deeper look into this package and found it to be really mis-packaged. Besides the nitpicking rpmlint complains about, the most critical bug is this package tagged "noarch", while it actually (unless I'm missing something) should be "arched". I am having a deeper look into it and will try to come up with a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

Please ignore - testing new mailling list signature
by Jose Pedro Oliveira 09 Feb '06

09 Feb '06

Sorry for the noise. Adding link to the Perl SIG wiki page.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-02-05 13:09 EST ------- Cool. OK, everything's looking good: No rpmlint blockers, just the end-of-line warning. Package meets naming and packaging guidelines. License is acceptable and matches License: tag. Specfile is properly named, legible, well-written, well-commented and uses macros consistently. Source file matches upstream. Package builds and installs on FC3 and FC4. BuildRequires: is proper. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #124197|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net 2006-02-05 12:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=124216) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=124216&action=view) srpm take #3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #124198|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net 2006-02-05 12:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=124215) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=124215&action=view) spec file take #3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 ------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net 2006-02-05 12:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > We can't just ignore the guidelines, so I suggest removing the BuildRequires: > while this gets worked out on the mailing list. I strongly suspect most FE packages follow the official templates, so leaving it might be the more conservative option IMHO. But I'll follow the reviewer position ;) > Also, could you comment the %exclude you added, so it's obvious why this is > required. > > I'll finish off the review in a few minutes. Ok, new spec/srpm in 30s -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-02-05 10:26 EST ------- I agree about the BuildRequires: perl thing, and indeed in another review I said it was not a blocker (which was my mistake) but then I noticed the MUST. I'm not sure what to do here; I think the MUST is unnecessary and conflicts with language in the the packaging guidelines: "There is no need to include the following packages or their dependencies as BuildRequires because they would occur too often." which doesn't sound very MUST like. We can't just ignore the guidelines, so I suggest removing the BuildRequires: while this gets worked out on the mailing list. Also, could you comment the %exclude you added, so it's obvious why this is required. I'll finish off the review in a few minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2006-02-05 06:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > BuildRequires: perl is not permitted. > This line is straight from the fedora-rpmdevtools-1.4-2.fc5 perl template. Is > the template wrong ? Mileages vary. IMO not and rather the MUST in the guidelines is a bit over the top in this case. See bug 179426. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #124187|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net 2006-02-05 05:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=124198) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=124198&action=view) Cleaned-up spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel February 2006