perl-devel February 2006

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
60 discussions

[Bug 180767] Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '06

10 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180767 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2006-02-10 10:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=124497) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=124497&action=view) Proposed patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180767] Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '06

10 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180767 rc040203(a)freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2006-02-10 09:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Fell free to provide a spec file patch. Or even takeover this package... > I don't want to maintain any perl modules I am already maintaining too many packages and am not really interested taking over this particular package. Anyway, I just just had a deeper look into this package and found it to be really mis-packaged. Besides the nitpicking rpmlint complains about, the most critical bug is this package tagged "noarch", while it actually (unless I'm missing something) should be "arched". I am having a deeper look into it and will try to come up with a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

Please ignore - testing new mailling list signature
by Jose Pedro Oliveira 09 Feb '06

09 Feb '06

Sorry for the noise. Adding link to the Perl SIG wiki page.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-02-05 13:09 EST ------- Cool. OK, everything's looking good: No rpmlint blockers, just the end-of-line warning. Package meets naming and packaging guidelines. License is acceptable and matches License: tag. Specfile is properly named, legible, well-written, well-commented and uses macros consistently. Source file matches upstream. Package builds and installs on FC3 and FC4. BuildRequires: is proper. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 ------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net 2006-02-05 12:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > We can't just ignore the guidelines, so I suggest removing the BuildRequires: > while this gets worked out on the mailing list. I strongly suspect most FE packages follow the official templates, so leaving it might be the more conservative option IMHO. But I'll follow the reviewer position ;) > Also, could you comment the %exclude you added, so it's obvious why this is > required. > > I'll finish off the review in a few minutes. Ok, new spec/srpm in 30s -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-02-05 10:26 EST ------- I agree about the BuildRequires: perl thing, and indeed in another review I said it was not a blocker (which was my mistake) but then I noticed the MUST. I'm not sure what to do here; I think the MUST is unnecessary and conflicts with language in the the packaging guidelines: "There is no need to include the following packages or their dependencies as BuildRequires because they would occur too often." which doesn't sound very MUST like. We can't just ignore the guidelines, so I suggest removing the BuildRequires: while this gets worked out on the mailing list. Also, could you comment the %exclude you added, so it's obvious why this is required. I'll finish off the review in a few minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel February 2006