perl-devel March 2006

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

7 participants
59 discussions

[Bug 84671] perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '06

10 Mar '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias(a)redhat.com 2006-03-10 11:18 EST ------- RE: Comment #5: > add -Dnoextensions='NDBM_File' to Configure parameters > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*NDBM*' -delete || : Yes, this would appear to be a much cleaner way of going about disabling NDBM (and GDBM). I will apply this in the next perl version - thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 84671] perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Mar '06

10 Mar '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671 ------- Additional Comments From altblue(a)n0i.net 2006-03-10 05:08 EST ------- If somebody dropped the ball again on NDBM issues and now you're again at updating the spec, Jason, would you please be so kind to properly fix it so it won't drop my beloved dbm filters? :( Memento (as many people - me included - told it a thousand times): this line is completely wrong: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*DBM_Filter*' | xargs rm -rfv as it does NOT drop "NDBM" filters ONLY, but every DBM filters :( Our approach is to add -Dnoextensions='NDBM_File' to Configure parameters and then, in %install: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*NDBM*' -delete || : so it will drop every _other_ NDBM hooks (i.e. Memoize) TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 151194] perl-RPM2 installs into site_perl; should set INSTALLDIRS=vendor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Mar '06

09 Mar '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-RPM2 installs into site_perl; should set INSTALLDIRS=vendor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151194 ------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2006-03-09 12:16 EST ------- Jason, (In reply to comment #1) > perl-RPM2 is now deprecated (no longer shipped as part of Fedora Core). > With the latest version of the .spec file submitted for Fedora Extras > consideration, this problem does not occur (installs correctly in vendorlib). I don't mind help reviewing it but I still haven't found a ticket for it. /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

Filtering requires/provides
by Paul Howarth 09 Mar '06

09 Mar '06

The current suggestion on the Packaging/Perl wiki page is (for Requires, Provides works the same) is: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Filter unwanted Requires: cat << \EOF > %{name}-req #!/bin/sh %{__perl_requires} $* |\ sed -e '/perl(unwanted_require)/d' EOF %define __perl_requires %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}-req chmod +x %{__perl_requires} ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This won't work for the majority of perl modules because the build directory is %{_builddir}/MODULENAME-%{version} rather than %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}. A simpler way that avoids generating script files at all might be: %global filtered_requires sh -c '%{__perl_requires} "$@" | %{__sed} -e "/^perl(unwanted_require)$/d"' %define __perl_requires %{filtered_requires} Anyone see any problems with this? P.S. I'm not an rpm macro expert and don't really know the significance of %global but using %define in its place results in a recursive macro definition, which doesn't work. Paul.

5 14

[Bug 151194] perl-RPM2 installs into site_perl; should set INSTALLDIRS=vendor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Mar '06

09 Mar '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-RPM2 installs into site_perl; should set INSTALLDIRS=vendor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151194 jvdias(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |perl-RPM2-0.66-12 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias(a)redhat.com 2006-03-09 12:02 EST ------- perl-RPM2 is now deprecated (no longer shipped as part of Fedora Core). With the latest version of the .spec file submitted for Fedora Extras consideration, this problem does not occur (installs correctly in vendorlib). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 163219] perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Mar '06

09 Mar '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163219 jvdias(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From jvdias(a)redhat.com 2006-03-09 11:35 EST ------- perl-PDL-2.4.2-2.fc4 now submitted to FC-4/Updates, which should resolve this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 152535] perl-RPM2 incomplete owned-files list
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Mar '06

08 Mar '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-RPM2 incomplete owned-files list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152535 jvdias(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From jvdias(a)redhat.com 2006-03-08 18:55 EST ------- Now fixed with perl-RPM2-0.66-12 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 84671] perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Mar '06

08 Mar '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671 jvdias(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From jvdias(a)redhat.com 2006-03-08 17:47 EST ------- So AFAIK the only disparity left with the current perl is : ... Conflicts: perl-NDBM_File <= 1:1.75-34.99.6 ... Now that the current perl removes NDBM::File, the above seems to be the only relic . Since nothing in core or extras provides perl-NDBM-File, including perl, this line should be removed. I've now removed the 'Conflicts: perl-NDBM_File <= 1:1.75-34.99.6' tag from the perl-5.8.8-5+ .spec file in CVS - it will go in with the next version, but I don't think this problem warrants a perl respin for FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 161785] spamassassin restart fails - functions bug?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Mar '06

08 Mar '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin restart fails - functions bug? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161785 wtogami(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|150222, 158504 |171491 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2006-03-08 11:40 EST ------- This is essentially fixed in FC5 and RHEL4U3, but I want to do a little more cleaning up of this before closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 84671] perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Mar '06

08 Mar '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671 jpo(a)di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|should something obsolete |perl: should something |perl-NDBM_File? |obsolete perl-NDBM_File? ------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2006-03-08 09:56 EST ------- Check the following lines in the perl specfile: ---------- ... Conflicts: perl-NDBM_File <= 1:1.75-34.99.6 ... # # Core modules removal # find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*NDBM*' | xargs rm -rfv find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*DBM_Filter*' | xargs rm -rfv ... ---------- and the following mail from Chip Turner: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2005-May/msg00002.html jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel March 2006