Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: No way to see why e-mail was marked as Junk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171578
------- Additional Comments From redhat(a)nodata.co.uk 2006-03-07 17:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> SpamAssassin by default puts headers in the message. Look for X-Spam-Status,
and it'll tell you the rules
> that hit, and potentially give you a report with more details. If it's not
there, you'll have to look into how
> you filter your mail.
Yes it would, if I had setup Spam Assassin myself, but I'm using Spam Assassin
that comes into Evolution.
Can you paste an example portion of the e-mail header added by Evolution's Spam
Assassin please? Which version are you using?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|150221 |150223, 171491
nThis| |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: No way to see why e-mail was marked as Junk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171578
------- Additional Comments From felicity(a)kluge.net 2006-03-07 15:30 EST -------
SpamAssassin by default puts headers in the message. Look for X-Spam-Status, and it'll tell you the rules
that hit, and potentially give you a report with more details. If it's not there, you'll have to look into how
you filter your mail.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: No way to see why e-mail was marked as Junk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171578
dmalcolm(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|dmalcolm(a)redhat.com |wtogami(a)redhat.com
CC| |parkerm(a)pobox.com, fedora-
| |perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com,
| |reg+redhat(a)sidney.com,
| |felicity(a)kluge.net,
| |jm(a)jmason.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180591
Summary: bad URL in perl-Net-Telnet package description
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: i386
URL: http://www.cpan.org/~jrogers/Net-Telnet-
3.03/lib/Net/Telnet.pm
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl-Net-Telnet
AssignedTo: jbrassow(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petrosyan(a)gmail.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060202 Fedora/1.5.0.1-2 Firefox/1.5.0.1
Description of problem:
bad URL: http://www.cpan.org/~jrogers/Net-Telnet-3.03/lib/Net/Telnet.pm in perl-Net-Telnet package description
the correct URL seems to be http://search.cpan.org/src/JROGERS/Net-Telnet-3.03/lib/Net/
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Net-Telnet-0-3.03-4.2
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
rpm -qi perl-Net-Telnet
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Break perl-libxml-enno into component CPAN modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128879
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2006-03-06 10:34 EST -------
done
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Spiffy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183028
------- Additional Comments From steve(a)silug.org 2006-03-03 10:51 EST -------
I haven't seen (or come up with) another solution that I'm completely happy with
yet, but I've been watching the "Filtering requires/provides" thread on
fedora-perl-devel-list. When that's resolved, I'll fix this and the other
packages I submitted, and I'll add code to cpanspec to match.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Spiffy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183028
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2006-03-03 02:17 EST -------
The sourcedir-trashing filter implementation was left in this package and also
applied in perl-IO-All. I wonder why is that?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Hi,
Last night, I issued a rebuild request of perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder for
FC5 and now am facing build errors:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/5571-perl-…
What puzzles me, is the same spec file having built flawlessly a couple
of weeks ago. Since then, except of the release-tag, this spec file has
not been changed. So I'd assume other perl modules or the main perl
package to be the cause (The previous built was with perl-5.8.7).
Any insights?
Ralf
P.S.:
This example demonstrates that noarch-perl dist rebuilds are useful. ;)