perl-devel September 2006

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

13 participants
62 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Bug 199152] New: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Oct '06

04 Oct '06

1 4

[Bug 185406] New: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Oct '06

04 Oct '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185406 Summary: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Version: 4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jvdias(a)redhat.com QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,prockai@redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #178343 +++ Description of problem: > Subject: h2ph problem > From: George Michaelson <ggm(a)apnic.net> > To: jvdias(a)redhat.com > Date: 2006-01-17 19:54 > > We just got bitten by 32bit vs 64bit logic in the .ph files generated > from socket.h/stddef.h/limits.h -bits/socket.ph to be exact. > > Undefined subroutine &main::__LONG_MAX__ called at (eval 436) line 1. > Compilation failed in require at > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/sy s/socket.ph line 11. > Compilation failed in require at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-threa d-multi/netinet/in.ph line > 9. > > > By removing some if/then/else logic, to make it just eval() the 32-bit > case, the problem went away. > > this was after applying an up2date on EL4 for perl 5.8.5: > > [ggm@curry log]$ uname -a > Linux curry.apnic.net 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Oct 18 18:39:27 EDT > 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [ggm@curry log]$ rpmquery -a | grep perl > newt-perl-1.08-7 > mod_perl-1.99_16-4 > perl-Net-DNS-0.48-1 > perl-Time-HiRes-1.55-3 > perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4 > perl-Filter-1.30-6 > perl-URI-1.30-4 > perl-Digest-SHA1-2.07-5 > perl-Digest-HMAC-1.01-13 > [ggm@curry log]$ > > the RPM errata lists > > > * Tue Nov 01 2005 Jason Vas Dias <jvdias(a)redhat.com> - 3:5.8.5-17.RHEL4 > > - fix bug 170088: broken h2ph fixed with h2ph from 5.8.7 > > - fix bug 171111 / upstream bug 37535: IOCPARM_LEN should be _IOC_SIZE > > - fix bug 172236: make h2ph pick up gcc built-in include directory > > Is it possible you haven't tested enough of the outcomes here? Without > this, the perl just doesn't work. > > -George > > --- socket.ph.dist 2006-01-17 16:44:41.000000000 +1000 > +++ socket.ph 2006-01-17 16:44:49.000000000 +1000 > @@ -90,11 +90,7 @@ > eval 'sub SOL_IRDA () {266;}' unless defined(&SOL_IRDA); > eval 'sub SOMAXCONN () {128;}' unless defined(&SOMAXCONN); > require 'bits/sockaddr.ph'; > - if((defined(&ULONG_MAX) ? &ULONG_MAX : 0) > 0xffffffff) { > - eval 'sub __ss_aligntype () { &__uint64_t;}' unless > defined(&__ss_aligntype); - } else { > eval 'sub __ss_aligntype () { &__uint32_t;}' unless > defined(&__ss_aligntype); - } > eval 'sub _SS_SIZE () {128;}' unless defined(&_SS_SIZE); > eval 'sub _SS_PADSIZE () {( &_SS_SIZE - (2* $sizeof{ > &__ss_aligntype}));}' unless defined(&_SS_PADSIZE); eval("sub MSG_OOB () { > 0x01; }") unless defined(&MSG_OOB); Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ALL - including RHEL-4 perl-5.8.5-* not a problem with RHEL-3 perl-5.8.0, because gcc-3.2.3's limits.h #defines things like __LONG_MAX__ How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: $ perl -e 'require "sys/socket.ph";' Actual results: Undefined subroutine &main::__LONG_MAX__ called at (eval 256) line 1. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/sys/socket.ph line 11. Compilation failed in require at -e line 1. Expected results: no errors -- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-01-19 12:20 EST -- Now that h2ph correctly picks up the gcc C standard includes, such as limits.h, from the gcc internal include directory (ie. /usr/lib/gcc/*.../include), which it was not doing before, due to bug 172236, some perl .ph files cannot be included because they refer to the newer gcc versions 'internal definitions' such as __INT_MAX__ / __LONG_MAX__ , which are no longer #define'd in any header file, but are 'built-in' to the newer gcc compilers, in the same way as __FILE__ or __LINE__ : $ echo 'int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) { long l=__LONG_MAX__; printf( "%ld\n",l); };' >tlm.c ( NOTE: no files are #include-ed ) $ gcc -o tlm tlm.c$ gcc -o tlm tlm.c tlm.c: In function ‘main’: tlm.c:1: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘printf’ $ ./tlm 2147483647 gcc's C standard headers define constants such as LONG_MAX / INT_MAX in terms of these internal definitions: $ egrep 'define\ (INT|LONG)_MAX' limits.h #define INT_MAX __INT_MAX__ #define LONG_MAX __LONG_MAX__ During the generation of the perl platform h2ph includes, we should create a file included by limits.ph that includes definitions for all the gcc 'internal definitions' such as __LONG_MAX__ that might be referenced . -- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-01-19 12:57 EST -- Created an attachment (id=123451) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=123451&action=view) Program to produce perl header for C built-in definitions Something like the output of this program needs to be prepended to limits.ph during the build of the perl h2ph platform headers . -- Additional comment from rc040203(a)freenet.de on 2006-01-19 13:15 EST -- I must be missing something, but why do you try to extract GCC proprietary, internals? #include <limits.h> and printing the corresponding POSIX defines would be portable. C.f. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/limits.h.html -- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-01-19 15:54 EST -- RE: Comment #3: /usr/include/limits.h just #includes' gcc's limits.h, unless '__GNUC__ < 2', and gcc's limits.h would in any case be found first in by a '#include <limits.h>' . The whole issue of h2ph and perl's platform includes needs a major revamp, which it will get once perl-5.8.8 comes out (soon, I hope). -- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-01-31 13:07 EST -- OK, it wasn't fixed in 5.8.8. I've now raised upstream perl bug #38385 : http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38385 on this issue, which includes a patch to fix it. This will be fixed in the next perl releases for RHEL-4, FC-4, and FC-5 (RHEL-3 is unaffected). -- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-02-02 18:15 EST -- Created an attachment (id=124075) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=124075&action=view) Program to include cpp internal built-in macros in system _h2ph_pre.ph -- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-02-02 18:21 EST -- This problem is fixed with perl-5.8.8-1 in FC-5, with the patch sent upstream, which checks for the existence of cpp internal built-ins in Configure, and writes them to $Config{cppsymbols} so they are correctly written to _h2ph_pre.pl. This patch will be applied to subsequent perl releases for FC-4 and RHEL-4 , but this problem probably does not warrant a complete perl respin just to fix it. Meanwhile, simply run the 'patch_h2ph_pre.pl' script attached above, as root, and the system _h2ph_pre.ph (which gets included by every perl header file) will be patched to define cpp built-ins it does not already define . -- Additional comment from updates(a)fedora.redhat.com on 2006-03-13 17:12 EST -- >From User-Agent: XML-RPC perl-5.8.6-24 has been pushed for FC4, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 6

recently orphaned perl modules....
by Chris Weyl 04 Oct '06

04 Oct '06

Hey all -- As the perl/extras SIG, do we want to have a process in place to pick up orphaned perl modules? That is, there are a number of modules that have been orphaned as part of the recent extras mass-rebuild effort... Rather than let them be removed for FC-6, I think there are benefits to our taking them over. But, if we decide this is a good idea, there are process questions here. Plan A: * SIG member announces intention to do a SIG takeover on this list * announce SIG takeover of orphan per usual process a day later * edit owners.list: list email as owner, actual person doing the taking as cc Plan B: ...erm. Someone else gets to suggest this :) Good idea? Bad? Yes? No? -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia

3 4

[Bug 207430] New: perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Oct '06

03 Oct '06

1 3

[Bug 199149] New: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Oct '06

03 Oct '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199149 Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released Product: Red Hat Web Application Stack Version: LAMPv1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jvdias(a)redhat.com QAContact: gozen(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #194077 +++ Description of problem: These upstream perl bugs / issue have beed fixed in the upstream 5.8.x maintenance release of perl since perl-5.8.8 was released: o 38454 - 'rindex corrects for $[ on bytes rather than UTF-8' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=38454 apply upstream patch #27116 o 24816 - 'Magic vars seem unsure if they are purely numeric' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=24816 ( perl -wle 'print $? = $? ^ "3"' -> 'Argument "^C" isn't numeric' ) apply upstream patch #27391 o Avoid writing over the input string in the case 'F' in moreswitches. apply upstream patch #27426 o 34925 - 'overload and rebless' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=34925 apply upstream patches #27509, #27512 o 34297: 'utf8 overload stringify bug (utf8 caching maybe)' upstream patch #28006 applied o 3038 - '$qr = qr/^a$/m; $x =~ $qr; fails' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=3038 apply upstream patch #27604 o apply upstream patch #27605 - 'Fix off-by-one in $0 set magic.' o 23141 - '($_) = () fails to set $_ to undef' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=23141 apply upstream patch #27914 o 38619 - 'Bug in lc and uc (interaction between UTF-8, substr, and lc/uc)' http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=38619 apply upstream patch #27329 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-4 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: See upstream bug reports and the new RHTS test cases in CVS perl/perl-tests/FC6 . -- Additional comment from jvdias(a)redhat.com on 2006-06-05 13:36 EST -- Fixed in perl-5.8.8-6 (FC-6) and perl-5.8.8-5 (FC5). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 178343] New: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Oct '06

02 Oct '06

1 11

[Bug 188441] New: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Oct '06

02 Oct '06

1 13

[Bug 172739] New: Deep recursion in CGI::Carp::warn
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Oct '06

02 Oct '06

1 4

[Bug 199372] New: PATCH: sparc64 use CFLAGS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Oct '06

02 Oct '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199372 Summary: PATCH: sparc64 use CFLAGS Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: sparc64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dennis(a)ausil.us QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,tcallawa@redhat.com Description of problem: sparc64 needs to use CFLAGS with CC to link properly using gcc the attached patch fixes this issue Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From dennis(a)ausil.us 2006-07-18 23:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=132651) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132651&action=view) use cflags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 194077] New: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Oct '06

02 Oct '06

1 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel September 2006