perl-devel September 2006

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

13 participants
62 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Bug 208639] New: Update request for perl-Archive-Tar
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '06

01 Oct '06

1 2

[Bug 208315] New: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Sep '06

30 Sep '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315 Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 Product: Fedora Core Version: test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Net-DNS AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rwfranks(a)acm.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Perl-Net-DNS-0.58 resolver search(), query(), bgsend() and send() methods not consistent in interpreting IPv4 and IPv6 addresses as a PTR query. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.58 Additional info: Since FC6-test3 went to press, Net::DNS 0.59 has been released. I realise that final release deadline is uncomfortably close, but think that the revised module fixes enough inconsistent and outright wrong behaviour to be well worth getting into FC6 if this is still possible. The CPAN bug references are: #20857 Resolver query() treats empty or undef name as default domain. #20994 Resolver search() erroneously applies search list to IPv6 address. #21402 Unable to prebuild PTR query from IP using Net::DNS:Packet->new(). The search() query() send() bgsend() and Packet->new() methods are now 100% consistent in the form of argument they accept. The inconsistency was reported in CPAN bug #20836 (later merged with #21402) I can confirm that revised module has been tested using FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 208535] New: perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Sep '06

30 Sep '06

1 1

[Bug 150224] FC6 Blocker Tracker
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Sep '06

29 Sep '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC6 Blocker Tracker Alias: FC6Blocker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=150224 matthias(a)rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |208535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

Would anyone like to maintain perl-RPM2 in Extras?
by Robin Norwood 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

Hi, perl-RPM2 has been approved for inclusion in Extras, but it needs a maintainer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 I'll take it if no-one else does. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching

1 0

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

1 0

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 paul(a)city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-09-25 02:58 EST ------- I'm happy to approve this now, but is Jason still around to maintain it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Sep '06

24 Sep '06

1 0

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Sep '06

24 Sep '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From cturner(a)pattern.net 2006-09-24 13:13 EST ------- I wrote this and RPM::Specfile while at red hat. The license is the same as perl itself: Perl5 is Copyright (C) 1993-2005, by Larry Wall and others. It is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of either: a) the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) any later version, or b) the "Artistic License". from: http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ A lawyer or two from RH contacted me and I've told them the above on a few occasions. I'll look into making new CPAN releases of these modules with a clear license as well. HTH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Sep '06

24 Sep '06

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel September 2006