Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208639
Summary: Update request for perl-Archive-Tar
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6test3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl-Archive-Tar
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Jose requested an update of this package to version 1.30
"It would make our life easier in Fedora Extras (sooner or later one of the 450+
perl modules that we maintain over there will require the latest version
of the above modules)."
Changelog:
http://search.cpan.org/src/KANE/Archive-Tar-1.30/CHANGES
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315
Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in
Net::DNS 0.59
Product: Fedora Core
Version: test3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl-Net-DNS
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: rwfranks(a)acm.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Perl-Net-DNS-0.58 resolver search(), query(), bgsend() and send() methods not
consistent in interpreting IPv4 and IPv6 addresses as a PTR query.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.58
Additional info:
Since FC6-test3 went to press, Net::DNS 0.59 has been released.
I realise that final release deadline is uncomfortably close, but think that the
revised module fixes enough inconsistent and outright wrong behaviour to be well
worth getting into FC6 if this is still possible.
The CPAN bug references are:
#20857 Resolver query() treats empty or undef name as default domain.
#20994 Resolver search() erroneously applies search list to IPv6 address.
#21402 Unable to prebuild PTR query from IP using Net::DNS:Packet->new().
The search() query() send() bgsend() and Packet->new() methods are now 100%
consistent in the form of argument they accept.
The inconsistency was reported in CPAN bug #20836 (later merged with #21402)
I can confirm that revised module has been tested using FC5.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208535
Summary: perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl-Net-DNS
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: matthias(a)rpmforge.net
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,jkeating@redhat.com
>From the automated check script :
perl-Net-DNS
FC5-updates > FC6 (0:0.59-1.fc5 > 0:0.58-1.fc6)
So please update the FC6 package and make sure it gets in before FC6 final,
otherwise the module might break for upgrades from FC5 to FC6.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: FC6 Blocker Tracker
Alias: FC6Blocker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=150224
matthias(a)rpmforge.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |208535
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Hi,
perl-RPM2 has been approved for inclusion in Extras, but it needs a
maintainer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
I'll take it if no-one else does.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
------- Additional Comments From rnorwood(a)redhat.com 2006-09-25 12:30 EST -------
No, he isn't. I'm maintaining most of the perl* packages for FC and RHEL, so I
could take it if no-one else wants it. I'll send a quick mail to
fedora-perl-devel to see if anyone else wants it first, though.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
paul(a)city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-09-25 02:58 EST -------
I'm happy to approve this now, but is Jason still around to maintain it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
------- Additional Comments From rnorwood(a)redhat.com 2006-09-24 18:20 EST -------
And I didn't even have to say his name three times!
Paul, is the above sufficient, or do you need to wait for the new CPAN release?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
------- Additional Comments From cturner(a)pattern.net 2006-09-24 13:13 EST -------
I wrote this and RPM::Specfile while at red hat. The license is the same as
perl itself:
Perl5 is Copyright (C) 1993-2005, by Larry Wall and others.
It is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of
either:
a) the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation;
either version 1, or (at your option) any later version, or
b) the "Artistic License".
from: http://dev.perl.org/licenses/
A lawyer or two from RH contacted me and I've told them the above on a few
occasions.
I'll look into making new CPAN releases of these modules with a clear license as
well.
HTH
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
------- Additional Comments From rnorwood(a)redhat.com 2006-09-24 12:17 EST -------
I can contact Chip to clarify the license.
Since FC5 and FC6 both still seem to have rpm-4.4.2, I assume we still want to
get this into extras, yes?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.